 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overheard in the tech blogosphere &#187; What&#8217;s the buzz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/tag/whats-the-buzz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard</link>
	<description>A Whatis.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: Blade servers, those hot little power suckers, not a GMOOT item</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-blade-servers-those-hot-little-power-suckers-not-a-gmoot-item/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-blade-servers-those-hot-little-power-suckers-not-a-gmoot-item/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's the buzz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-blade-servers-those-hot-little-power-suckers-not-a-gmoot-item/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blade server adoption has been discussed for a number of years now, but the form factor hasn&#8217;t been embraced in the way it was initially expected. One of the main reasons is that they are often referred to as &#8220;hot little power-suckers.&#8221; Thoughtput, Bring Blades Back From The Future GMOOT = get me one of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellPadding="5" cellSpacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2007/10/blade1.gif" alt="blade1.gif" /></td>
<td>Blade server adoption has been discussed for a number of years now, but the form factor hasn&#8217;t been embraced in the way it was initially expected. One of the main reasons is that they are often referred to as &#8220;<a href="http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/category/blade-servers/">hot little power-suckers</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thoughtput, <a href="http://thoughtput.typepad.com/thoughtput/2007/10/bring-blades-ba.html">Bring Blades Back From The Future</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-i-downgraded-to-windows-xp-from-vista/"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://thoughtput.typepad.com/thoughtput/2007/10/bring-blades-ba.html"></a></p>
<p>GMOOT = get me one of those </p>
<blockquote><p>For most, the tried and trusted 1U and 2U rack mounted servers have been reliable and familiar workhorses, dramatically reducing the urgency of blade adoption.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-blade-servers-those-hot-little-power-suckers-not-a-gmoot-item/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
