<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overheard in the tech blogosphere &#187; Verizon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/tag/verizon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard</link>
	<description>A Whatis.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: Verizon using stance towards net neutrality as a gorilla marketing message</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-verizon-using-stance-towards-net-neutrality-as-a-gorilla-marketing-message/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-verizon-using-stance-towards-net-neutrality-as-a-gorilla-marketing-message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FiOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-verizon-using-stance-towards-net-neutrality-as-a-gorilla-marketing-message/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Verizon is kinda sorta using their total lack of filtering as an underground marketing thing already, which is especially effective when coupled with FiOS&#8217;s insane speeds.&#8221; Matt Buchanan, Will Your ISP F You In the A? Bandwidth Hogs Beware Interesting post by Matt Muchanan over at Gizmodo about ISP bandwidth management practices.  Can it be true that everyone but [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellPadding="5" cellSpacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2008/04/matt_buchanan_sm.jpg" alt="matt_buchanan_sm.jpg" /></td>
<td><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2008/04/keyboard.gif" title="keyboard.gif"></a>&#8220;Verizon is kinda sorta using their total lack of filtering as an underground marketing thing already, which is especially effective when coupled with FiOS&#8217;s insane speeds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Matt Buchanan, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/378760/will-your-isp-f-you-in-the-a-bandwidth-hogs-beware" class="top"><font color="#dc870e">Will Your ISP F You In the A? Bandwidth Hogs Beware</font></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/378760/will-your-isp-f-you-in-the-a-bandwidth-hogs-beware" class="top"></a></p>
<p>Interesting post by Matt Muchanan over at Gizmodo about ISP bandwidth management practices.  Can it be true that everyone but Verizon admitted they were managing bandwith? </p>
<blockquote><p> &#8221;We don&#8217;t manage our network by throttling, slowing or curbing service, either on DSL or FiOS.&#8221; In reference to content filtering, we weren&#8217;t given a new statement, but referred to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/353097/verizon-says-f+u-to-hollywood-piracy-snitching"><font color="#dc870e">earlier remarks</font></a> by public affairs VP Tom Tauke that it is &#8220;reluctant to get into the business of examining content that flows across our networks,&#8221; the most pro-active stance against content filtering. However, it&#8217;s still no fan of the <a href="http://newscenter.verizon.com/press-releases/verizon/2008/verizon-says-competition.html"><font color="#dc870e">government stepping in</font></a>: &#8220;These are decisions best made by network engineers and operators—not policymakers.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Managing bandwidth has a new name, btw.  &#8220;Filtering&#8221; is out.   So is &#8220;throttling,&#8221; &#8221;capping,&#8221; and &#8220;curbing.&#8221; </p>
<p>The new name? &#8221;Traffic shaping techniques.&#8221; Hats off to whoever thought that one up.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-verizon-using-stance-towards-net-neutrality-as-a-gorilla-marketing-message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
