 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overheard in the tech blogosphere &#187; PON</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/tag/pon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard</link>
	<description>A Whatis.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: GPON and Active Ethernet are complementary technologies</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-gpon-and-active-ethernet-are-complementary-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-gpon-and-active-ethernet-are-complementary-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Active Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiber to the curb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-gpon-and-active-ethernet-are-complementary-technologies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PON (Passive Optical Network) and Active Ethernet have falsely been cast as competitive technologies when, in fact, they are complementary. David Russell, marketing director at Calix Increasingly, GPON and Active Ethernet are being viewed as complementary technologies based on the application. GPON is ideal for mass residential and small business deployments, while Active Ethernet is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2008/09/russell-david97.gif" alt="russell-david97.gif" /></td>
<td>PON (Passive Optical Network) and Active Ethernet have falsely been cast as competitive technologies when, in fact, they are complementary.</p>
<p>David Russell, marketing director at Calix</td>
</tr>
</table>
<blockquote><p>Increasingly, GPON and Active Ethernet are being viewed as complementary  technologies based on the application. GPON is ideal for mass residential and  small business deployments, while Active Ethernet is sometimes preferred for  larger businesses that demand dedicated fiber access.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-gpon-and-active-ethernet-are-complementary-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
