 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overheard in the tech blogosphere &#187; network security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/tag/network-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard</link>
	<description>A Whatis.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Overheard &#8211; Confliker / Downadup worm alert</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-confliker-downadup-worm-alert/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-confliker-downadup-worm-alert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-based malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/?p=1867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security vendors from across the spectrum have warned that a stingy worm has been successfully exploiting a hole in Microsoft Windows server service. Known as Confliker or Downadup, the worm spreads by exploiting a remote procedure call (RPC) vulnerability. Robert Westerfelt, Confliker, Downadup worm hype? Get the facts There&#8217;s a new variant of the Conficker [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2009/01/rob_westervelt.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1870" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2009/01/rob_westervelt.jpg" alt="" width="74" height="86" /></a></td>
<td>Security vendors from across the spectrum have warned that a stingy worm has been successfully exploiting a hole in Microsoft Windows server service. Known as Confliker or Downadup, the worm spreads by exploiting a remote procedure call (RPC) vulnerability.</p>
<p>Robert Westerfelt, <a title="Confliker, Downadup worm hype? Get the facts" rel="bookmark" href="http://security.blogs.techtarget.com/2009/01/21/confliker-downadup-worm-hype-get-the-facts/">Confliker, Downadup worm hype? Get the facts</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>There&#8217;s a new variant of the Conficker worm. It&#8217;s known as ‘Downadup.’ Microsoft <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS08-067.mspx">issued a patch for the worm last October</a> but it&#8217;s still spreading and mutating.</p>
<p>The worm, which some authorities say has been able to build the largest botnet on record,  works by exploiting <a href="http://www.cert-in.org.in/vulnerability/civn-2008-170.htm">a vulnerability in remote procedure calls</a> that allows remote code to be executed once a vulnerable machine receives a specially crafted RPC request.  In plain English, this means that if an end user views a specially crafted Web page using Internet Explorer, his computer will request malicious code to be executed. Like many of its malicious predecessors, this worm denies infected machines Internet access to security vendor websites. </p>
<p>Microsoft added routines to clean up Conficker infections to the January edition of its <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/malwareremove/default.mspx">Malicious Software Removal Tool</a>.  Customers in the U.S. and Canada can receive technical support from <a href="http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=21131">Microsoft Product Support Services</a> at 1-866-PCSAFETY. There is no charge for support calls that are associated with security updates. The National Cyber Alert System recommends that to prevent further infections by infected USB devices, users should  <a href="http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-020A.html">disable</a> the Windows <a href="http://searchwinit.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid1_gci1026049,00.html">auto-play</a> feature.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-confliker-downadup-worm-alert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: How does anomaly-based monitoring fit into tomorrow&#8217;s security picture?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-how-does-anomaly-based-monitoring-fit-into-tomorrows-security-picture/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-how-does-anomaly-based-monitoring-fit-into-tomorrows-security-picture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anomaly detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-how-does-anomaly-based-monitoring-fit-into-tomorrows-security-picture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We knew that the volume of new attacks and the vectors used were only going to increase, so we chose to stay ahead of the curve with a behavioral analysis system. I believe behavior and anomaly-based solutions will be most effective long term. Jamie Arnold, as quoted in SUNY&#8217;s Binghamton Monitors Network with Lancope&#8217;s StealthWatch [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2008/12/network.jpg" /></td>
<td>We knew that the volume of new attacks and the vectors used were only going to increase, so we chose to stay ahead of the curve with a behavioral analysis system. I believe behavior and anomaly-based solutions will be most effective long term.</p>
<p>Jamie Arnold, as quoted in <a href="http://campustechnology.com/articles/69479/">SUNY&#8217;s Binghamton Monitors Network with Lancope&#8217;s StealthWatch</a></td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>I spent part of the morning reading about anomaly-based network monitoring. In October, IBM announced that they would no longer sell the IBM Proventia Network Anomaly Detection System (ADS).   <a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci1235157,00.html">Stealthwatch</a> seems to be getting a lot of buzz, especially with college campuses whose biggest threats probably come from right inside the network.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-how-does-anomaly-based-monitoring-fit-into-tomorrows-security-picture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
