Data Encryption archives - Overheard in the tech blogosphere

Overheard in the tech blogosphere:

data encryption

Jul 14 2009   2:22PM GMT

Overheard - Defining parameters for data encryption



Posted by: Margaret Rouse
Mark Wright, Massachusetts 201 CMR 17.00, data encryption, Privacy, consumer protection, Compliance

“Massachusetts is taking data encryption regulation to the next level by actually defining what is meant by encryption, and this definition includes all data that is in transition, in storage and on portable devices.”

Mark Wright, The Evolution of Data

From 201 CMR 17.00: STANDARDS FOR THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION OF RESIDENTS OF THE COMMONWEALTH / Definitions section

“Encrypted,” transformation of data through the use of a 128-bit or higher algorithmic process, or other means or process approved by the office of consumer affairs and business regulation that is at least as secure as such algorithmic process, into a form in which there is a low probability of assigning meaning without use of a confidential process or key.

Jun 3 2008   12:29PM GMT

Overheard: More than token opposition to tokenization



Posted by: Margaret Rouse
Security, data encryption, data management
credit_cards.jpg The most popular reason for not implementing tokenization is that companies have already implemented data encryption and key management systems costing hundreds of thousands of dollars, and either they did not feel they needed tokenization or they were unwilling to be perceived by upper management as “changing course” by recommending the removal of the data they just spent all this money to protect.

Evan Schuman, Opposition To Tokenization A Lot More Than Token