 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overheard in the tech blogosphere &#187; CTO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/tag/cto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard</link>
	<description>A Whatis.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Overheard &#8211; Why Cisco bought Flip</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-why-cisco-bought-flip/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-why-cisco-bought-flip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Padmasree Warrior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/?p=2239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the things we see happening is combining video communications with social networking&#8211;what we call &#8220;visual networking,&#8221; which will change the way we do business and how we communicate with our families. Padmasree Warrior,  as quoted in America&#8217;s First CTO? I guess we&#8217;ll have to define &#8216;visual networking.&#8217; David Talbot at MIT Technology Review [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2009/03/padmasreewarrior.jpg" alt="warrior" /></td>
<td>One of the things we see happening is combining video communications with social networking&#8211;what we call &#8220;visual networking,&#8221; which will change the way we do business and how we communicate with our families.</p>
<p>Padmasree Warrior,  as quoted in <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/22097/page1/">America&#8217;s First CTO?</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I guess we&#8217;ll have to define &#8216;<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/qa_c67-482177_ns827_Networking_Solutions_Q_and_A.html">visual networking</a>.&#8217;</p>
<p>David Talbot at MIT Technology Review has an <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/22097/page1/">entertaining nterview </a>with Padmasree Warrior, Cisco&#8217;s CTO. Rumor has it that she&#8217;ll be President Obama&#8217;s pick for America&#8217;s CTO.</p>
<p>As you probably know by now, Cisco has acquired Pure Digital (makers of the popular <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxAIAqM5TVk">Flip</a> video camera) for $159 million.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not surprised by the acquisition, but I am confused that Cisco said they were adding Flip to the &#8216;Cisco Consumer Business Group.&#8217;  What&#8217;s up with that name? If your group is named Consumer Business Group, doesn&#8217;t that account for ummmm&#8230;.everyone?</p>
<p><a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2009/corp_031909.html">According to Cisco</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Upon the close of the acquisition, the Pure Digital team will become part of  Cisco&#8217;s Consumer Business Group, which includes Linksys® by Cisco® home  networking, audio and media-storage products. Jonathan Kaplan, chairman and CEO of Pure Digital, will become general manager  of the combined organization, reporting to Ned Hooper, Senior Vice President of Cisco&#8217;s Corporate Development and Consumer  Groups.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-why-cisco-bought-flip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard &#8211; Millennials and the economic downturn</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-millennials-and-the-economic-downturn/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-millennials-and-the-economic-downturn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/?p=1749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The global downturn has been a brutal awakening for the youngest members of the workforce—variously dubbed “the Millennials”, “Generation Y” or “the Net Generation” by social researchers. From The Economist print edition Generation Y goes to work]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The global downturn has been a brutal awakening for the youngest members of the workforce—variously dubbed “the Millennials”, “Generation Y” or “the Net Generation” by social researchers.</p>
<p>From The Economist print edition <a href="http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12863573">Generation Y goes to work</a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-millennials-and-the-economic-downturn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard &#8211; Who wants to be Obama&#8217;s National CTO?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-who-wants-to-be-obamas-national-cto/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-who-wants-to-be-obamas-national-cto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National CTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-who-wants-to-be-obamas-national-cto/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Silicon Valley is chattering about who will get tapped to be the nation&#8217;s first &#8220;chief technology officer&#8221; in the Obama administration. There&#8217;s no doubt the job will be a tough one but could offer one surprising perk: a quiet way to cash out of a stock portfolio and invest in, say, Treasury bonds, while significantly [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2008/12/elizabeth_corcoran.jpg" alt="elizabeth_corcoran.jpg" /></td>
<td>Silicon Valley is chattering about who will get tapped to be the nation&#8217;s first &#8220;chief technology officer&#8221; in the Obama administration. There&#8217;s no doubt the job will be a tough one but could offer one surprising perk: a quiet way to cash out of a stock portfolio and invest in, say, Treasury bonds, while significantly deferring any capital gains taxes.</p>
<p>Elizabeth Corcoran, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/home/2008/11/11/first-cto-obama-tech-cio-cx_ec_1111firstcto.html">Obama&#8217;s CTO: It&#8217;s Not About The Money</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<blockquote><p>But the job that the Obama team has in mind seems to be less about setting a  lofty vision statement for the government and more about orchestrating tactics  to get different agencies to cooperate, share best practices and live up to the  goal of creating a &#8220;more transparent&#8221; government.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-who-wants-to-be-obamas-national-cto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: Who will be the first cabinet-level CTO?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-who-will-be-the-first-cabinet-level-cto/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-who-will-be-the-first-cabinet-level-cto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National CTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-who-will-be-the-first-cabinet-level-cto/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A month or so ago the question of whether the next president should have a CTO came up in a work conversation among a diverse group of tech policy folks. We all agreed that the title is nice, but you would need to establish and delineate real power for it. Of course, the best way [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2008/10/white-house.jpg" alt="white-house.jpg" /></td>
<td>A month or so ago the question of whether the next president should have a CTO came up in a work conversation among a diverse group of tech policy folks. We all agreed that the title is nice, but you would need to establish and delineate real power for it. Of course, the best way to do this would be to create a cabinet position for technology and innovation. People rolled their eyes at this until it was reminded to them that we do have a Secretary of Agriculture.</p>
<p>Sean Garrett, <a href="http://463.blogs.com/the_463/2008/08/the-case-for-a.html">The Case for a National CTO</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s about time the White House acknowledged that we&#8217;ve moved from the agrarian age to the information age.  Having a national CTO is a great idea &#8212; I bet that we could learn a lot about pitfalls from going back and learning how the position of Secretary of Agriculture came about. First, we&#8217;ll need to define what a CTO&#8217;s responsibilities are.  (At some companies right now, the CTO reports to the CIO &#8212; at others, the CIO reports to the CTO.)  Then we&#8217;ll need to decide whether the CTO should actually have experience in technology or whether he/she should come from business.</p>
<p>From Wikipedia:</p>
<blockquote><p>On May 15, 1862, President Abraham Lincoln established the independent Department of Agriculture to be headed by a Commissioner without cabinet status.  Lincoln called it the &#8220;people&#8217;s department&#8221;. In the 1880s, varied special interest groups were lobbying for Cabinet representation. Business interests sought a Department of Commerce and Industry. Farmers tried to raise the Department of Agriculture to Cabinet rank. In 1887, the House and Senate passed bills giving cabinet status to the Department of Agriculture and Labor, but farm interests objected to the addition of labor, and the bill was killed in conference. Finally, on February 9, 1889, President Grover Cleveland signed a bill into law elevating the Department of Agriculture to Cabinet level.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-who-will-be-the-first-cabinet-level-cto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
