 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overheard in the tech blogosphere &#187; Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/tag/ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard</link>
	<description>A Whatis.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: AJAX, ARAX, APAX, APhpAX, etc.</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-ajax-arax-apax-aphpax-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-ajax-arax-apax-aphpax-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APhpAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-ajax-arax-apax-aphpax-etc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this [ARAX] is about using Silverlight to host client-side browser scripting in Ruby, it&#8217;s definitely an appealing notion, but the problem will always be about Silverlight being a Microsoft technology. Ben Galbraith, as quoted in  Johnson: Wrapping JavaScript in a loving Ruby embrace, and ARAX  From InfoWorld: Today, it is common for developers to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2008/10/ben-galbraith-bw.jpg" alt="ben-galbraith-bw.jpg" /></td>
<td>If this [ARAX] is about using Silverlight to host client-side browser scripting in Ruby, it&#8217;s definitely an appealing notion, but the problem will always be about Silverlight being a Microsoft technology.</p>
<p>Ben Galbraith, as quoted in  <a href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/johnson-wrapping-javascript-in-a-loving-ruby-embrace-and-arax" title="Wrapping JavaScript in a loving Ruby embrace, and ARAX" rel="bookmark">Johnson: Wrapping JavaScript in a loving Ruby embrace, and ARAX</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<blockquote>
<p class="ArticleBody"> From <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/06/Microsoft-Silverlight-to-back-Ruby-Python-in-browser_1.html">InfoWorld</a>:</p>
<p class="ArticleBody">Today, it is common for  developers to use JavaScript in the browser. But with Microsoft&#8217;s planned  release of <span class="regularArticleU">Silverlight</span> 2 later this year, developers could begin using  Python and Ruby on the client as well. Ruby and Python already are being used  for server-side development.</p>
<p class="ArticleBody">&#8220;What we’ve done through  <a href="http://searchwindevelopment.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid8_gci1256631,00.html">Silverlight</a> is to make it possible to use Ruby or Python as an alternative to  JavaScript for building the same types of applications,&#8221; said Brian Goldfarb, group manager for Microsoft&#8217;s developer division.  Developers could write code for Silverlight that is executed in the browser.</p>
<p class="ArticleBody">&#8220;All the browser needs to have is  Silverlight installed and then developers can take advantage of these  languages,&#8221; on the client, he said. Silverlight provides rich experiences with  capabilities like video and graphics, Goldfarb said. It is viewed as rival to  the Adobe Flash platform.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I can hardly keep these straight, although I&#8217;m thankful the names are so logical!</p>
<p><a href="http://searchwindevelopment.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid8_gci1107521,00.html">AJAX</a> &#8211; <em>asynchronous JavaScript and XML</em></p>
<p>ARAX &#8211; <em>asynchronous <a href="http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,289893,sid9_gci541564,00.html">Ruby</a> and XML</em></p>
<p>APAX -  <em>asynchronous <a href="http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,290660,sid39_gci213538,00.html">Python</a> and XML</em></p>
<p>APhpAX &#8211; <em>asynchronous <a href="http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,290660,sid39_gci334246,00.html">PHP</a> and XML</em></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-ajax-arax-apax-aphpax-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: How do you measure engagement?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-the-new-website-metric-should-be-page-views-x-average-time-spent/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-the-new-website-metric-should-be-page-views-x-average-time-spent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-the-new-website-metric-should-be-page-views-x-average-time-spent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Lately, of course, there has been some controversy around the efficacy of the Page View as the atom of Internet consumption—largely triggered by the penetration of AJAX technology, which enables content to refresh on screen without serving a new Page View.&#8221; Josh Chasin, The Now is Time Josh writes: These two developments—the decline in the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellPadding="5" cellSpacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img width="102" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/8/files/2007/10/josh_chasin.png" alt="josh_chasin.png" height="153" /></td>
<td>&#8220;Lately, of course, there has been some controversy around the efficacy of the Page View as the atom of Internet consumption—largely triggered by the penetration of AJAX technology, which enables content to refresh on screen without serving a new Page View.&#8221;</p>
<p>Josh Chasin, <a href="http://www.comscore.com/blog/2007/10/the_now_is_time.html">The Now is Time</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<blockquote><p>Josh writes: These two developments—the decline in the efficacy of the Page View and the increased demand for engagement—dovetail nicely in Internet metrics, because both argue for a reconsideration of time and space. Specifically, I contend that they argue for a shift in emphasis from Page Views to duration-based audience metrics.Maybe we need to think about online media consumption in two flavors: Time Spent, and Engaged Time Spent.</p>
<p><span id="more-123"></span></p>
<p>What if we could track the time consumers spend with each web property—whether comprised of pages, audio, video, IM or widget—in a way that allows for capturing multi-tasking behavior? Say I’ve got Facebook and CNN.com open on my screen, along with two IM windows and a ballgame. My engagement to any one of these things ebbs and flows, but I’m spending time with all of them simultaneously.</p>
<p>I’m laying all this out because I think this is where Internet audience measurement needs to go—tracking both total Time Spent (maybe we call it “Multi-tasking Time Spent”) and Engaged Time Spent. With these two metrics, advertisers and publishers could start thinking about things like Share of Time Spent; what percent of a website’s Time Spent is Engaged Time Spent, and how can they drive that figure higher?</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-the-new-website-metric-should-be-page-views-x-average-time-spent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
