Open source - When free is really not free - Overheard in the tech blogosphere
» VIEW ALL POSTS May 13 2009   12:56PM GMT

Open source - When free is really not free



Posted by: Margaret Rouse
Open source, open source textbooks, cost of open source
“It might look cheaper on paper, but if you look at what you want to do with it and it requires a substantial engineering effort rather than a commercial product, then it’s not necessarily the most effective solution.”

Adam Honoré,  as quoted in Wall Street Opens Doors to Open Source Technologies

Today’s WhatIs.com Word of the Day is open source.  Open source describes a software program whose source code is made freely available for use or modification.

The poor economic climate has given the open source movement a boost as budget cuts force IT departments to look around for the most cost-effective way to get projects done.  You might think that “freely available” is the same thing as “free” — but most of us don’t know how to use that free code.  We’d either end up paying a distributor like Red Hat to help us out — or we’d need to keep people in house that can work with the source code.  Either way,  we’d be shelling out money.

Comment on this Post


You must be logged-in to post a comment. Log-in/Register

RockyM  |   May 13 2009   8:32PM GMT

We’d either end up paying a distributor like Red Hat to help us out — or we’d need to keep people in house that can work with the source code.  Either way,  we’d be shelling out money.</code]

By major commerical code, only an idiot buys it without service contracts - and you’re still likely going to need some in-house expertise… it would be foolish to think you’re going to eliminate technical  expertise by going to Open Source - or conversely going with Commercial - so I see this as likely a wash. The real question is which product provides the needs - Open Source package or the commercial package.


 

MargaretRouse  |   May 13 2009   8:55PM GMT

Rocky,
I agree. Software, as in all great art, should follow the mantra “form follows function.”