<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overheard in the tech blogosphere</title>
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Overheard: Google frogs going back to the small pond</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-googles-frogs-going-back-to-the-small-pond/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-googles-frogs-going-back-to-the-small-pond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-googles-frogs-going-back-to-the-small-pond/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


It would be easy to dismiss the exodus of some of Google&#8217;s best people if it were an isolated occurrence. It isn&#8217;t.
Adam Lashinsky, Where does Google go next?




Fact is, Google&#8217;s torrid growth is finally slowing, as the company&#8217;s sheer size dictates it must. And size necessitates changes. Gone are the days when Google could take [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellPadding="5" cellSpacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img width="104" src="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/05/adam_lashinsky.jpg" alt="adam_lashinsky.jpg" height="133" /></td>
<td>It would be easy to dismiss the exodus of some of Google&#8217;s best people if it were an isolated occurrence. It isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Adam Lashinsky, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/09/technology/where_does_google_go.fortune/index.htm">Where does Google go next?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/04/keyboard.gif" title="keyboard.gif"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/09/technology/where_does_google_go.fortune/index.htm"></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Fact is, Google&#8217;s torrid growth is finally slowing, as the company&#8217;s sheer size dictates it must. And size necessitates changes. Gone are the days when Google could take full advantage of its quirkiness. It&#8217;s the market leader now, which presents a classic conundrum: Which is more important, process or innovation? For all Google&#8217;s success, it still has just one meaningful way of making money: its powerful search-advertising system.</p></blockquote>
<p> This article ties in with <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0801/gallery.bestcos_top50.fortune/index.html">CNN Money &#8217;s Top 50 employers </a>list.  I had the pleasure of working for their #3 pick during college &#8212; <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0801/gallery.bestcos_top50.fortune/3.html">Wegman&#8217;s</a>.  The Google article has me wondering &#8212; is it always more fun when you&#8217;re young and struggling? Or is it just that looking back, it SEEMS like it was more fun.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-googles-frogs-going-back-to-the-small-pond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: Is CNet - CBS marriage the beginning of a trend?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-is-cnet-cbs-marriage-the-beginning-of-a-trend/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-is-cnet-cbs-marriage-the-beginning-of-a-trend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-is-cnet-cbs-marriage-the-beginning-of-a-trend/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


This deal raises the question of whether any CBS competitors will decide to get into the game of buying Internet content companies.
Peter Cohan, CBS to buy CNet: Who&#8217;s next?



Peter offers three possible targets:


TheStreet.com (NASDAQ: TSCM) - This provider of business, investment and ratings content has $65 million in sales and a market cap of $236 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellPadding="5" cellSpacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img width="93" src="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/05/peter_cohen.jpg" alt="peter_cohen.jpg" height="137" /></td>
<td><a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/04/keyboard.gif" title="keyboard.gif"></a>This deal raises the question of whether any CBS competitors will decide to get into the game of buying Internet content companies.</p>
<p>Peter Cohan, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-to-buy-cnet-whos-next/">CBS to buy CNet: Who&#8217;s next?</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-to-buy-cnet-whos-next/"></a><br />
Peter offers three possible targets:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TheStreet.com</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TSCM</a>) - This provider of business, investment and ratings content has $65 million in sales and a market cap of $236 million.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/techtarget-inc/ttgt/nas">TechTarget</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/techtarget-inc/ttgt/nas">TTGT</a>) - This provider of online content for buyers and sellers of corporate information technology (IT) products has $95 million in sales and a $531 million market cap.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/webmd-health-corp/wbmd/nas">WebMD Health Corp</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/webmd-health-corp/wbmd/nas">WBMD</a>) - This provider health information services to consumers, physicians and other healthcare professionals, employers and health plans has $332 million in sales and it&#8217;s market capitalization is $1.7 billion&#8217;</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>The Associated Press reports that CBS  is buying CNet  for $1.75 billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-is-cnet-cbs-marriage-the-beginning-of-a-trend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: Biometric verification, the Lunch Lady, and Big Momma</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-biometric-verification-the-lunch-lady-and-big-momma/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-biometric-verification-the-lunch-lady-and-big-momma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[scanners]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[POS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biometric verification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-biometric-verification-the-lunch-lady-and-big-momma/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


&#8220;Never again will a student hold up a lunch line to search for his/her ID card, fear peer pressure for being on a Free or Reduced meal plan, or have someone else charge a meal on their account.&#8221;
Advertisement for  Sagem Morpho biometric scanner



Parents and educators concerned about the childhood obesity epidemic now have a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/05/schoollunch.jpg" alt="schoollunch.jpg" height="147" width="194" /></td>
<td>&#8220;Never again will a student hold up a lunch line to search for his/her ID card, fear peer pressure for being on a Free or Reduced meal plan, or have someone else charge a meal on their account.&#8221;</p>
<p>Advertisement for  <a href="http://www.foodserve.com/fprint.htm">Sagem Morpho biometric scanner</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bobbiejohnson.org/?p=1213"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<blockquote><p>Parents and educators concerned about the childhood obesity epidemic now have a new<br />
ally that&#8217;s helping them apply tough love in the school cafeteria: fingerprint biometric<br />
readers linked to point-of-sale (POS) systems and home internet connections that help them<br />
monitor and restrict kids&#8217; unhealthy lunch purchases.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ok, this is kind of creepy. I can picture parent&#8217;s I&#8217;ve known really doing this. What&#8217;s next? Video monitors so you can check from work and make sure your kid isn&#8217;t trading with someone else? It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how this next generation figures out how to set parental boundries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-biometric-verification-the-lunch-lady-and-big-momma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: Overclocking is a personality trait</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-overclocking-is-a-personality-trait/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-overclocking-is-a-personality-trait/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 22:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-overclocking-is-a-personality-trait/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: What kind of idiot would do that to NEW, EXPENSIVE hardware?
Answer: The same kind of person who, 10 years from now &#8212; when he gets his amazing new 200,000 GHz 512 bit processor with a terabyte of RAM &#8212; will say &#8220;How do I overclock it?&#8221;

This conversation on Slashdot made me laugh out loud. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Question: What kind of idiot would do that to NEW, EXPENSIVE hardware?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Answer: The same kind of person who, 10 years from now &#8212; when he gets his amazing new 200,000 GHz 512 bit processor with a terabyte of RAM &#8212; will say &#8220;How do I overclock it?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p>This conversation on Slashdot made me laugh out loud. They were talking about an <a href="http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=gethowto&amp;howtoID=58">AMD Athlon 64 General Overclocking Guide.</a> It&#8217;s totally beyond me why any sane person would want to take perfectly good hardware, void the warranty, put so much extra stress on components that the hardware&#8217;s lifespan is significantly shortened &#8212; and risk causing a fire &#8212; just so he could brag on some discussion board about how fast he got something going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-overclocking-is-a-personality-trait/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: Social networking? SHOW ME THE MONEY!</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-social-networking-show-me-the-money/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-social-networking-show-me-the-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-social-networking-show-me-the-money/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Facebook&#8217;s real problem isn&#8217;t privacy, it&#8217;s monetization.
Dave McClure, as quoted in Social-networking sites work to turn users into profits




 In many respects, it is the same query that dogged portal companies in the mid-1990s and search engines in the early &#8217;90s. Some were sold. Some went public. Some went belly up.
The ongoing challenge is to concoct [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellPadding="5" cellSpacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img width="82" src="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/05/dollarsign.jpg" alt="dollarsign.jpg" height="107" /></td>
<td><a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/04/keyboard.gif" title="keyboard.gif"></a></p>
<p class="inside-copy">Facebook&#8217;s real problem isn&#8217;t privacy, it&#8217;s monetization.</p>
<p class="inside-copy"><span class="inside-head">Dave McClure, as quoted in <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/techinvestor/industry/2008-05-11-social-networking_N.htm?csp=tech">Social-networking sites work to turn users into profits</a></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<blockquote>
<p class="inside-copy"> In many respects, it is the same query that dogged portal companies in the mid-1990s and search engines in the early &#8217;90s. Some were sold. Some went public. Some went belly up.</p>
<p class="inside-copy">The ongoing challenge is to concoct a potion — be it through banner ads, premium subscriptions or licensing agreements — that no one has perfected. Facebook, crown jewel of the field, is valued at $15 billion but barely turns a profit.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-social-networking-show-me-the-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: The Great Firewall of China</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-the-great-firewall-of-china/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-the-great-firewall-of-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firewalls]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-the-great-firewall-of-china/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Depending on how you look at it, the Chinese government’s attempt to rein in the Internet is crude and slapdash or ingenious and well crafted.
John Ritter, The Connection Has Been Reset


When American technologists write about the control system, they tend to emphasize its limits. When Chinese citizens discuss it—at least with me—they tend to emphasize [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellPadding="5" cellSpacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img width="134" src="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/05/great-wall-of-china.JPG" alt="great-wall-of-china.JPG" height="113" /></td>
<td><a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/04/keyboard.gif" title="keyboard.gif"></a><a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/05/great_wall.png" title="great_wall.png"></a>Depending on how you look at it, the Chinese government’s attempt to rein in the Internet is crude and slapdash or ingenious and well crafted.</p>
<p>John Ritter, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200803/chinese-firewall">The Connection Has Been Reset</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<blockquote><p><u></u>When American technologists write about the control system, they tend to emphasize its limits. When Chinese citizens discuss it—at least with me—they tend to emphasize its strength. All of them are right, which makes the government’s approach to the Internet a nice proxy for its larger attempt to control people’s daily lives.<a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/05/great_wall.png" title="great_wall.png"></a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-the-great-firewall-of-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: There&#8217;s no killer app for GRC software</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-theres-no-killer-app-for-grc-software/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-theres-no-killer-app-for-grc-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[risk management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-theres-no-killer-app-for-grc-software/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Most people assume that so-called GRC software&#8211;governance, risk and compliance&#8211;will continue to gather steam, as big boys like Oracle and SAP continue their marketing. It makes sense to automate compliance and risk issues, but the reality of this nascent field is that there really isn&#8217;t a single point solution.
John Hagerty, CFOs face complex GRC software [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellPadding="5" cellSpacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/05/johnhagerty.gif" alt="johnhagerty.gif" /></td>
<td><a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/04/keyboard.gif" title="keyboard.gif"></a>Most people assume that so-called GRC software&#8211;governance, risk and compliance&#8211;will continue to gather steam, as big boys like Oracle and SAP continue their marketing. It makes sense to automate compliance and risk issues, but the reality of this nascent field is that there really isn&#8217;t a single point solution.</p>
<p>John Hagerty, <a href="http://www.fiercesarbox.com/story/cfos-face-complex-grc-software-decisions/2008-02-26?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss">CFOs face complex GRC software decisions</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://www.fiercesarbox.com/story/cfos-face-complex-grc-software-decisions/2008-02-26?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-theres-no-killer-app-for-grc-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: Microsoft disagrees with GPL&#8230;again</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-microsoft-disagrees-with-gplagain/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-microsoft-disagrees-with-gplagain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Open source]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-microsoft-disagrees-with-gplagain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


&#8220;With open source software, there is this thing called the  GPL, which we disagree with.&#8221;
Bill Gates as quoted in Bill Gates on Pharmaceuticals: The System Isn&#8217;t Working 



I have to admit, I am  a big Bill Gates fan.  Richard Stallman, on the other hand,  is definitely not a Bill Gates fan. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2007/10/bill_gates.gif" /></td>
<td>&#8220;With open source software, there is this thing called the  GPL, which we disagree with.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bill Gates as quoted in <a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/04/bill-gates-what.html">Bill Gates on Pharmaceuticals: The System Isn&#8217;t Working </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bobbiejohnson.org/?p=1213"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>I have to admit, I am  a big Bill Gates fan.  Richard Stallman, on the other hand,  is definitely <a href="http://linuxclub.blogspot.com/2007/01/maverick-richard-stallman-keeps-faith.html">not a Bill Gates fan</a>.   It&#8217;s seems like I read and read and read about Microsoft and open source, but I still can&#8217;t hear what MS is saying because I can&#8217;t get past the politics and the gigantic personalities of these two men.  I wish they&#8217;d both stop blowing smoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-microsoft-disagrees-with-gplagain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: AML software and the law of unintended consequences</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-aml-software-and-the-law-of-unintended-consequences/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-aml-software-and-the-law-of-unintended-consequences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-aml-software-and-the-law-of-unintended-consequences/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Poor Eliot Spitzer. The former governor of New York resigned in disgrace last month amid allegations he hired a high-priced call girl. In a matter of days, Mr. Spitzer went from potential presidential candidate to — in the tech world, at least — the poster boy for software usually used to snare fraudsters, money launderers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellPadding="5" cellSpacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img width="139" src="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/05/eliot_spitzer.jpg" alt="eliot_spitzer.jpg" height="169" /></td>
<td><a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/04/keyboard.gif" title="keyboard.gif"></a>Poor Eliot Spitzer. The former governor of New York resigned in disgrace last month amid allegations he hired a high-priced call girl. In a matter of days, Mr. Spitzer went from potential presidential candidate to — in the tech world, at least — the poster boy for software usually used to snare fraudsters, money launderers and terrorists.</p>
<p>Ian Harvey, <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080416.wgtaunder17/BNStory/">Anti-laundering software casts wide net to catch big fish</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>A little more info about how <a href="http://searchfinancialsecurity.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid185_gci1312768,00.html">AML software</a> accidently caught a big fish.<br />
<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080416.wgtaunder17/BNStory/"></a></p>
<blockquote><p>By law in Canada and the U.S., banks are obligated to report cash transactions of more than $10,000. According to U.S. federal officials, Mr. Spitzer&#8217;s transactions were flagged because it appeared as though he was trying to evade notice by moving several smaller amounts, which is known as &#8220;structuring.&#8221; In Mr. Spitzer&#8217;s case, three cash transactions amounting to more than $10,000 within a relatively short time frame set off alarms.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-aml-software-and-the-law-of-unintended-consequences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard: Are data Center efficiency metrics purposely obtuse?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-are-data-center-efficiency-metrics-purposely-obtuse/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-are-data-center-efficiency-metrics-purposely-obtuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rouse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-are-data-center-efficiency-metrics-purposely-obtuse/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


 I have come to the realization that this industry does a wonderful job in telling its members WHAT to do, but lacks to follow-up with the HOW.
Michael Manos, Struggling with CADE, McKinsey / Uptime Metric 


Lots of buzz about the Uptime Institute&#8217;s symposium on IT Energy Efficiency and the study McKinsey released called Revolutionizing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/files/2008/05/michaelmanos.jpg" alt="michaelmanos.jpg" height="128" width="85" /></td>
<td><a href="http://www.bobbiejohnson.org/?p=1213"></a> I have come to the realization that this industry does a wonderful job in telling its members WHAT to do, but lacks to follow-up with the HOW.</p>
<p>Michael Manos, <a href="http://unthrottled.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!3B07BABB3D3318AA!633.entry?wa=wsignin1.0">Struggling with CADE, McKinsey / Uptime Metric </a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Lots of buzz about the Uptime Institute&#8217;s symposium on IT Energy Efficiency and the study McKinsey released called <a href="http://uptimeinstitute.org/content/view/168/57">Revolutionizing Data Center Efficiency</a> .   It&#8217;s interesting that Michael Manos estimates that only 10% of data center managers measure the efficiency of their facilities.  Could it be because it&#8217;s almost impossible for the average Joe to get the data they need to plug in the formulas? Or could it be that they&#8217;re waiting for a clear winner in the proposed metrics? Try this one out for size: CADE.</p>
<p>CADE is the new metric-of-the-week.</p>
<blockquote><p>CADE (Corporate Average Data center Efficiency) = (Facility Efficiency) x (Asset Efficiency)</p>
<p>Facility Efficiency is defined as (Facility Energy Efficiency) * (Facility Utilization)<br />
Asset Efficiency is defined as (IT Energy Efficiency) * (IT utilization)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/overheard/overheard-are-data-center-efficiency-metrics-purposely-obtuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
