<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Discussion on: Open source networking hums along, quietly</title>
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/networkhub/open-source-networking-hums-along-quietly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Socializedsoftware</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/networkhub/open-source-networking-hums-along-quietly/#comment-91</link>
		<author>Socializedsoftware</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/networkhub/open-source-networking-hums-along-quietly/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I agree that open source networking growth is on the rise. I would add that you are also seeing a rise in commercial open source software like Hyperic (www.hyperic.com) for networked application management and Zenoss (www.zenoss.com) for general IT infrastructure and network management. I concede that Nagios is a stable for many in monitoring but I suspect the ones I mentioned are being quickly added to more network engineers toolboxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that open source networking growth is on the rise. I would add that you are also seeing a rise in commercial open source software like Hyperic (www.hyperic.com) for networked application management and Zenoss (www.zenoss.com) for general IT infrastructure and network management. I concede that Nagios is a stable for many in monitoring but I suspect the ones I mentioned are being quickly added to more network engineers toolboxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
