 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco Dynamips and Juniper Olive: A little clarity on router emulators, please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/networkhub/cisco-dynamips-and-juniper-olive-a-little-clarity-on-router-emulators-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/networkhub/cisco-dynamips-and-juniper-olive-a-little-clarity-on-router-emulators-please/</link>
	<description>A SearchNetworking.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: MNorwood</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/networkhub/cisco-dynamips-and-juniper-olive-a-little-clarity-on-router-emulators-please/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>MNorwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/networkhub/?p=1105#comment-217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree more. They want tons of certified individuals but the cost associated with buying hardware is not affordable for many. I don&#039;t see how this will help in the long run. Especially since the newer hardware from Cisco is requiring software licenses to turn on certain features. It seems like networking vendors could release a handicapped version of their software to run on emulators. I don&#039;t see Cisco listening since they are too busy selling Flip and their 100 iterations of video teleconferencing. Juniper on the other hand, might pay attention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. They want tons of certified individuals but the cost associated with buying hardware is not affordable for many. I don&#8217;t see how this will help in the long run. Especially since the newer hardware from Cisco is requiring software licenses to turn on certain features. It seems like networking vendors could release a handicapped version of their software to run on emulators. I don&#8217;t see Cisco listening since they are too busy selling Flip and their 100 iterations of video teleconferencing. Juniper on the other hand, might pay attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
