 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Network technologies and trends &#187; switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/network-technologies/tag/switchport-trunk-encapsulation-dot1q/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/network-technologies</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Trunking encapsulation mismatch was the problem</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/network-technologies/trunking-encapsulation-mismatch-was-the-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/network-technologies/trunking-encapsulation-mismatch-was-the-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yasir Irfan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[%EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic trunking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port-channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port-channel between Cisco 6500 Series and Cisco 3750 E Series switches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Te1/7 is not compatible with Te2/7 and will be suspended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Te2/7 is trunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenGigabitEthernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trunk mode of Te1/7 is dynamic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trunking encapsulation mismatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trunking encapsulation mismatch was the problem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/network-technologies/trunking-encapsulation-mismatch-was-the-problem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Jan 22 09:09:33: %EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Te1/7 is not compatible with Te2/7 and will be suspended (trunk mode of Te1/7 is dynamic, Te2/7 is trunk)&#8221; If you see the above error especially while creating a port-channel between Cisco 6500 Series and Cisco 3750 E Series switches don&#8217;t panic. You will see the error when there is a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/58/files/2011/01/trunk-error1.jpg"></a><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/58/files/2011/01/etherchannel1.jpg"></a></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000">&#8220;Jan 22 09:09:33: %EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Te1/7 is not compatible with Te2/7 and will be suspended (trunk mode of Te1/7 is dynamic, Te2/7 is trunk)&#8221;</span></p>
<p>If you see the above error especially while creating a port-channel between Cisco 6500 Series and Cisco 3750 E Series switches don&#8217;t panic. You will see the error when there is a trunking encapsulation mismatch for the interfaces associated with the port-channel. When we changed the trunk settings in the both interfaces the problem was solved and port-channel was established.</p>
<p>When the following error occurred</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000">&#8220;Jan 22 09:09:33: %EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Te1/7 is not compatible with Te2/7 and will be suspended (trunk mode of Te1/7 is dynamic, Te2/7 is trunk)&#8221;</span></p>
<p>The tenGigabitEthernet 1/7 was configured with <span style="color: #ff0000">switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q</span>. When we removed the command with <span style="color: #ff0000">&#8220;no switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q&#8221;</span> the problem was solved.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/58/files/2011/01/trunk-error1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1020" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/58/files/2011/01/trunk-error1.jpg" alt="" width="555" height="360" /></a></p>
<p>Basically the issue was one link was configured for dynamic trunking and other was a trunk a port without any negotiation enabled.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/58/files/2011/01/etherchannel1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1018" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/58/files/2011/01/etherchannel1.jpg" alt="" width="657" height="321" /></a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/network-technologies/trunking-encapsulation-mismatch-was-the-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
