 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP Tablet Number 2 With a Bullet (To the Head)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/mobile-cloud-view/hp-tablet-number-2-with-a-bullet-to-the-head/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/mobile-cloud-view/hp-tablet-number-2-with-a-bullet-to-the-head/</link>
	<description>Ron Miller looks at news &#38; trends in the cloud &#38; mobile industries.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Pr0curve</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/mobile-cloud-view/hp-tablet-number-2-with-a-bullet-to-the-head/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Pr0curve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/mobile-cloud-view/?p=872#comment-349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are assuming that all of the competitors to the iPad are equal and therefore should enjoy the same success as the iPad. As a previous owner of the HP Touchpad I can tell you it in no way matched my iPad, it was heavier, thicker, slower. About the best thing going for it was WebOS which was pretty neat. In the end I sold it on eBay for twice what I paid for it. My point is that Apple dominates the market (for now) because the product is superior, not necessarily in features but in build quality, OS integration and ease of use. Same as the iPod, and the iPhone when they were released. They may not have been the best products on the market but the worked the best. Until competitors can get beyond checking off features on a list and can actually build a product that works well with all of its features together Apple will continue to dominate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are assuming that all of the competitors to the iPad are equal and therefore should enjoy the same success as the iPad. As a previous owner of the HP Touchpad I can tell you it in no way matched my iPad, it was heavier, thicker, slower. About the best thing going for it was WebOS which was pretty neat. In the end I sold it on eBay for twice what I paid for it. My point is that Apple dominates the market (for now) because the product is superior, not necessarily in features but in build quality, OS integration and ease of use. Same as the iPod, and the iPhone when they were released. They may not have been the best products on the market but the worked the best. Until competitors can get beyond checking off features on a list and can actually build a product that works well with all of its features together Apple will continue to dominate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
