 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Folder security issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wondows-2003-enterprise-edition-folder-security-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wondows-2003-enterprise-edition-folder-security-issue/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: csnoek</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wondows-2003-enterprise-edition-folder-security-issue/#comment-57582</link>
		<dc:creator>csnoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Dwiebesick,

What you state is entirely correct. It had to do with the inheritance from the top level of the disk. That was set to just Administrators and System. I corrected the &quot;problem&quot; manually and now everything works fine.

What I intended to do with this question was to find out what was the reason for this. Both your and Carlosdl&#039;s answer  confirm what I thought was the reason for this situation. To put it bluntly, somebody messed with the normal settings on this disk. They removed the other groups, obviously for security reasons and in the mean time creating a big mess.

Thank you both for your help. I wasn&#039;t sure enough myself of what the reason behind this happening was.

Thanks once again.

Corné]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dwiebesick,</p>
<p>What you state is entirely correct. It had to do with the inheritance from the top level of the disk. That was set to just Administrators and System. I corrected the &#8220;problem&#8221; manually and now everything works fine.</p>
<p>What I intended to do with this question was to find out what was the reason for this. Both your and Carlosdl&#8217;s answer  confirm what I thought was the reason for this situation. To put it bluntly, somebody messed with the normal settings on this disk. They removed the other groups, obviously for security reasons and in the mean time creating a big mess.</p>
<p>Thank you both for your help. I wasn&#8217;t sure enough myself of what the reason behind this happening was.</p>
<p>Thanks once again.</p>
<p>Corné</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlosdl</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wondows-2003-enterprise-edition-folder-security-issue/#comment-57547</link>
		<dc:creator>carlosdl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad you solved it.
I don&#039;t think it is a domain policy.  It might has something to do with permissions inheritance, as Dwiebesick
 suggested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you solved it.<br />
I don&#8217;t think it is a domain policy.  It might has something to do with permissions inheritance, as Dwiebesick<br />
 suggested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csnoek</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wondows-2003-enterprise-edition-folder-security-issue/#comment-57527</link>
		<dc:creator>csnoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Carlos,

&lt;i&gt;The situation is:
Those other groups do not appear in the security tab, and you are not able to add them by pressing the “Add” button. Is this correct ?&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, I can add them manually, but then I am a local administrator. What worried me though was the fact that these groups were not there in the first place. Is that a domain policy?

After I added them manually the application I installed worked fine, so problem solved. But I am wondering about the cause, not so much the solution.

Best regards,

Corné]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Carlos,</p>
<p><i>The situation is:<br />
Those other groups do not appear in the security tab, and you are not able to add them by pressing the “Add” button. Is this correct ?</i></p>
<p>Yes, I can add them manually, but then I am a local administrator. What worried me though was the fact that these groups were not there in the first place. Is that a domain policy?</p>
<p>After I added them manually the application I installed worked fine, so problem solved. But I am wondering about the cause, not so much the solution.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Corné</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlosdl</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wondows-2003-enterprise-edition-folder-security-issue/#comment-57403</link>
		<dc:creator>carlosdl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Corné.

Just to clarify this a little.

The situation is:
Those other groups do not appear in the security tab, and you are not able to add them by pressing the &quot;Add&quot; button.  Is this correct ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Corné.</p>
<p>Just to clarify this a little.</p>
<p>The situation is:<br />
Those other groups do not appear in the security tab, and you are not able to add them by pressing the &#8220;Add&#8221; button.  Is this correct ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/8 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 311/312 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 16:44:50 -->