Comments on: Wireless Network Bottleneck???? http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-network-bottleneck/ Sat, 26 May 2012 19:28:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Wireless News » Blog Archive » Wireless Network Bottleneck???? http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-network-bottleneck/#comment-51111 Wireless News » Blog Archive » Wireless Network Bottleneck???? Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:25:17 +0000 #comment-51111 [...] Original post by unknown [...] [...] Original post by unknown [...]

]]> By: Papp http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-network-bottleneck/#comment-50999 Papp Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:24:00 +0000 #comment-50999 If you have more money than time or pateince... First, how are you determining the 250kbs? All zeros? Before you answer, try downloading wireshark. You will need a switch that can mirror a port in front of the the Airlock. Put a PC/laptop on that mirrored port and filter for the target IP to test. Also the "end-user PC should have wireshark but capture "all". Run your packet generating application and watch for resends, window length, drops, etcetra. On the Airlock side, watch for how much useful traffic is comming through. Compare the captures by watching the sequence numbers. Voila! more answers than you could ask. If you have more money than time or pateince…

First, how are you determining the 250kbs? All zeros?
Before you answer, try downloading wireshark. You will need a switch that can mirror a port in front of the the Airlock. Put a PC/laptop on that mirrored port and filter for the target IP to test. Also the “end-user PC should have wireshark but capture “all”. Run your packet generating application and watch for resends, window length, drops, etcetra. On the Airlock side, watch for how much useful traffic is comming through. Compare the captures by watching the sequence numbers. Voila! more answers than you could ask.

]]> By: Jstrahler http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-network-bottleneck/#comment-50997 Jstrahler Sun, 30 Dec 2007 05:17:11 +0000 #comment-50997 Do you think it would be benifitial to add 3 more acess points to service the other 3 main access points? Mainly, do you think we should invest in another T-1 line, several, or how many do you think we would need. And is there a cheap way to hook those T-1's together to give us a bridged Internet connection on our network?? Our main concern is our speed... It never used to be this slow, until we added the last 30 or so customers online... At first I thought it might be the broadcast traffic from all of the main towers and the other clients, so we subnetted our 192.168.5.0 network onto the 255.255.255.244 network. The speed was a little better, but still far from our goal of 512kbs up and down. Is this a realistic goal. Thanks for the help!!!!!!! Me and my buddy need help!!! We are doing this wireless internet gig for fun and a service to our community!!! We aren't the experts on this, it is basically a learn by doing business. Thanks, Josh Do you think it would be benifitial to add 3 more acess points to service the other 3 main access points? Mainly, do you think we should invest in another T-1 line, several, or how many do you think we would need. And is there a cheap way to hook those T-1’s together to give us a bridged Internet connection on our network?? Our main concern is our speed… It never used to be this slow, until we added the last 30 or so customers online… At first I thought it might be the broadcast traffic from all of the main towers and the other clients, so we subnetted our 192.168.5.0 network onto the 255.255.255.244 network. The speed was a little better, but still far from our goal of 512kbs up and down. Is this a realistic goal.

Thanks for the help!!!!!!! Me and my buddy need help!!! We are doing this wireless internet gig for fun and a service to our community!!! We aren’t the experts on this, it is basically a learn by doing business.

Thanks, Josh

]]>