Comments on: Wireless Camera Network Hopping http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-camera-network-hopping/ Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:20:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Schmidtw http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-camera-network-hopping/#comment-55505 Schmidtw Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:02:44 +0000 #comment-55505 I have found continuous flex RJ45 cable. I think this will solve my problem. I have found continuous flex RJ45 cable. I think this will solve my problem.

]]> By: Schmidtw http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-camera-network-hopping/#comment-55353 Schmidtw Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:31:45 +0000 #comment-55353 No official site survey has been done. I will consider this option, But I think I have a workable solution. There is a retractable cable unit. If I run some cable there it should work fine. Plus it will be hard wired. I will have to find RJ45 cable that can bend endlessly though. No official site survey has been done.

I will consider this option, But I think I have a workable solution. There is a retractable cable unit. If I run some cable there it should work fine. Plus it will be hard wired.

I will have to find RJ45 cable that can bend endlessly though.

]]> By: Robert Stewart http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-camera-network-hopping/#comment-55271 Robert Stewart Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:58:15 +0000 #comment-55271 I assume a sight survey was done before installation. You are correct the generators will produce unwanted interference along with the metal cage itself. I manage and maintain several locations around the country that use wireless access points in conjunction with Symbol MC9090g scan guns for shipping purposes, it seems the older the wharehouse the more problems we have. With that being said I have had good luck with my wireless infrastucture using a company called Ryzex Inc, you can google them they have always delivered when I was in need. They will of course ask if a site survey has been completed and will want one done if not already completed. Hope this will help you out. I assume a sight survey was done before installation. You are correct the generators will produce unwanted interference along with the metal cage itself. I manage and maintain several locations around the country that use wireless access points in conjunction with Symbol MC9090g scan guns for shipping purposes, it seems the older the wharehouse the more problems we have. With that being said I have had good luck with my wireless infrastucture using a company called Ryzex Inc, you can google them they have always delivered when I was in need. They will of course ask if a site survey has been completed and will want one done if not already completed. Hope this will help you out.

]]> By: Schmidtw http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-camera-network-hopping/#comment-55181 Schmidtw Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:01:49 +0000 #comment-55181 I guess the point i was trying to bring out originally was kind of overlooked. I want to get a strong wireless signal into 8 floors of elevator shaft. Mounting points in the shaft are extremely limited. The best place to mount would be the cieling of the shaft, but about 2 feet above are generators and motors powering the elevators and they create a lot of magnetic and frequency-limiting fields. I guess the point i was trying to bring out originally was kind of overlooked. I want to get a strong wireless signal into 8 floors of elevator shaft. Mounting points in the shaft are extremely limited. The best place to mount would be the cieling of the shaft, but about 2 feet above are generators and motors powering the elevators and they create a lot of magnetic and frequency-limiting fields.

]]> By: Schmidtw http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-camera-network-hopping/#comment-54851 Schmidtw Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:14:45 +0000 #comment-54851 I've heard that DSSS is far more reliable, is much better for wireless hopping, and is faster because of its implementation. What I have read indicates this is only a viable solution for a 2MBps network, and I want much more, of course. Any suggestions? Is there a source for information like this that I haven't yet found? I’ve heard that DSSS is far more reliable, is much better for wireless hopping, and is faster because of its implementation. What I have read indicates this is only a viable solution for a 2MBps network, and I want much more, of course. Any suggestions? Is there a source for information like this that I haven’t yet found?

]]> By: Schmidtw http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-camera-network-hopping/#comment-54738 Schmidtw Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:01:21 +0000 #comment-54738 Another detail I forgot to include is the fact that the elevator is an older style, metal cage, so it is not condusive at ALL to wireless signals. I'm looking at NFSS DSSS and FHSS and at this point, I'm not certain which I should pursue for the wirless network camera located in the elevator. Any suggestions? Another detail I forgot to include is the fact that the elevator is an older style, metal cage, so it is not condusive at ALL to wireless signals.

I’m looking at NFSS DSSS and FHSS and at this point, I’m not certain which I should pursue for the wirless network camera located in the elevator.
Any suggestions?

]]> By: Schmidtw http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-camera-network-hopping/#comment-54697 Schmidtw Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:55:19 +0000 #comment-54697 Thanks for the info. I have switches on each floor. Thanks for the info.

I have switches on each floor.

]]>