 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless B, G, and G+</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-b-g-and-g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-b-g-and-g/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:11:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: lisaphifer</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wireless-b-g-and-g/#comment-46329</link>
		<dc:creator>lisaphifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 11:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[802.11b products have been around for several years. They have a top link speed of 11 Mbps, but in practice deliver about 5-6 Mbps when the wireless station and AP (or router) are close to each other (~20 feet). As distance increases, link speed drops, until the station and AP can no longer communicate effectively.

802.11g products have been around for about two years now. 802.11g is a backwards-compatible upgrade from 802.11b because (unlike 802.11a) B and G operate on the same radio frequencies. Standard G has a top link speed of 54 Mbps - again, this means throughput of perhaps ~25 Mbps when the station and AP are close, dropping with distance.

Technically, B and G have the same range, but G products can deliver higher throughput at a distance.  In practical terms, that means that you&#039;ll communicate more effectively when your station and AP are, say, 100 feet apart, with walls in between them. Also, a new G product is just plain likely to work better than an old B product from the same vendor due to code fixes and hardware improvements unrelated radio standards.

If you have old laptops with built-in B cards, but you&#039;re buying new adapters for new laptops or new APs/routers, it makes good sense to buy G products today.  They&#039;re likely to cost the same or very little more than B products, and can interoperate with older B products, albeit no faster than 11 Mbps.  When B and G products operate in the same area, the G products must use a compatibility mode that reduces their top speed, but G-to-G connections will still be faster than B-to-G connections at the same distance.

Finally, what is G-plus?  You could be asking about any one of MANY vendor extensions to 802.11g.  For example, Atheros? Super G bonds two radio channels to get a top link speed of 108 Mbps (60 Mbps throughput) -- see www.super-g.com. Or you could be thinking of Broadcom&#039;s 54g BroadRange technology, which extends 802.11g&#039;s range without channel bonding.  The IEEE is working on an even higher-speed WLAN standard, 802.11n, to be based on some kind of as-yet-unchosen MIMO (multiple input multiple output) technology.  Several products labeled &quot;extended G&quot; or &quot;pre N&quot; implement MIMO-related technologies to go faster and reach farther -- see http://searchmobilecomputing.com/tip/0,289483,sid40_gci1068451,00.html for several examples.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>802.11b products have been around for several years. They have a top link speed of 11 Mbps, but in practice deliver about 5-6 Mbps when the wireless station and AP (or router) are close to each other (~20 feet). As distance increases, link speed drops, until the station and AP can no longer communicate effectively.</p>
<p>802.11g products have been around for about two years now. 802.11g is a backwards-compatible upgrade from 802.11b because (unlike 802.11a) B and G operate on the same radio frequencies. Standard G has a top link speed of 54 Mbps &#8211; again, this means throughput of perhaps ~25 Mbps when the station and AP are close, dropping with distance.</p>
<p>Technically, B and G have the same range, but G products can deliver higher throughput at a distance.  In practical terms, that means that you&#8217;ll communicate more effectively when your station and AP are, say, 100 feet apart, with walls in between them. Also, a new G product is just plain likely to work better than an old B product from the same vendor due to code fixes and hardware improvements unrelated radio standards.</p>
<p>If you have old laptops with built-in B cards, but you&#8217;re buying new adapters for new laptops or new APs/routers, it makes good sense to buy G products today.  They&#8217;re likely to cost the same or very little more than B products, and can interoperate with older B products, albeit no faster than 11 Mbps.  When B and G products operate in the same area, the G products must use a compatibility mode that reduces their top speed, but G-to-G connections will still be faster than B-to-G connections at the same distance.</p>
<p>Finally, what is G-plus?  You could be asking about any one of MANY vendor extensions to 802.11g.  For example, Atheros? Super G bonds two radio channels to get a top link speed of 108 Mbps (60 Mbps throughput) &#8212; see <a href="http://www.super-g.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.super-g.com</a>. Or you could be thinking of Broadcom&#8217;s 54g BroadRange technology, which extends 802.11g&#8217;s range without channel bonding.  The IEEE is working on an even higher-speed WLAN standard, 802.11n, to be based on some kind of as-yet-unchosen MIMO (multiple input multiple output) technology.  Several products labeled &#8220;extended G&#8221; or &#8220;pre N&#8221; implement MIMO-related technologies to go faster and reach farther &#8212; see <a href="http://searchmobilecomputing.com/tip/0,289483,sid40_gci1068451,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://searchmobilecomputing.com/tip/0,289483,sid40_gci1068451,00.html</a> for several examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 268/271 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-24 04:13:03 -->