 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows XP using only NBNS, not DNS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: bobkberg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/#comment-44078</link>
		<dc:creator>bobkberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 12:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, much as I hate to give up on a problem, I&#039;m doing so.  My final solution is/was to export the software key and ROOT hive and reapply them over a clean install.

I&#039;ll let you all know how that went when I&#039;m done.

Bob
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, much as I hate to give up on a problem, I&#8217;m doing so.  My final solution is/was to export the software key and ROOT hive and reapply them over a clean install.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll let you all know how that went when I&#8217;m done.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyfreek</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/#comment-44079</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyfreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 21:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob:

A good resource for looking up those Event log errors is www.eventid.net.  I&#039;ve seen DCOM+ cause problems for DNS Servers in Active Directory and for Microsoft Exchange Server, but I don&#039;t believe it does anything for the local DNS as I&#039;ve disabled the COM before on a machine and it still worked.  

Microsoft says: 
Warning If you disable DCOM, may you may lose operating system functionality. After you disable support for DCOM, the following may result:
? Any COM objects that can be started remotely may not function correctly. 
? The local COM+ snap-in will not be able to connect to remote servers to enumerate their COM+ catalog. 
? Certificate auto-enrollment may not function correctly. 
? Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) queries against remote servers may not function correctly.

Found here: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;825750

Since it&#039;s only used for remote COM functionality, it shouldn&#039;t affect you and you don&#039;t want/need WMI.

Hope this helps.

SF
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob:</p>
<p>A good resource for looking up those Event log errors is <a href="http://www.eventid.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.eventid.net</a>.  I&#8217;ve seen DCOM+ cause problems for DNS Servers in Active Directory and for Microsoft Exchange Server, but I don&#8217;t believe it does anything for the local DNS as I&#8217;ve disabled the COM before on a machine and it still worked.  </p>
<p>Microsoft says:<br />
Warning If you disable DCOM, may you may lose operating system functionality. After you disable support for DCOM, the following may result:<br />
? Any COM objects that can be started remotely may not function correctly.<br />
? The local COM+ snap-in will not be able to connect to remote servers to enumerate their COM+ catalog.<br />
? Certificate auto-enrollment may not function correctly.<br />
? Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) queries against remote servers may not function correctly.</p>
<p>Found here: <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;825750" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;825750</a></p>
<p>Since it&#8217;s only used for remote COM functionality, it shouldn&#8217;t affect you and you don&#8217;t want/need WMI.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
<p>SF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenie</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/#comment-44080</link>
		<dc:creator>greenie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 07:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob,

One other I forgot to post.

http://www.snapfiles.com/get/winsockxpfix.html

Try that download. It is a Winsock registry repair tool for WinXP.

Greenie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>One other I forgot to post.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.snapfiles.com/get/winsockxpfix.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.snapfiles.com/get/winsockxpfix.html</a></p>
<p>Try that download. It is a Winsock registry repair tool for WinXP.</p>
<p>Greenie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petermac</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/#comment-44081</link>
		<dc:creator>petermac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 12:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry didn&#039;t mean for you to uninstall DNS, you are right neither it nor TCP/IP can be uninstalled directly. Try just disabling it, in properties, then after reboot turn it on again. As last resort uninstall networking completely, (Remove NIC in system device manager), reboot, and let it all re-install (make sure you have any neccessary drivers). This will rebuild all networking registry entries, (Only thing it doesn&#039;t fix is corrupt winsock stack). If you want to find problem export out registry beforehand, and again after you have it fixed. You can then run a filecompare utility to pick up differences. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry didn&#8217;t mean for you to uninstall DNS, you are right neither it nor TCP/IP can be uninstalled directly. Try just disabling it, in properties, then after reboot turn it on again. As last resort uninstall networking completely, (Remove NIC in system device manager), reboot, and let it all re-install (make sure you have any neccessary drivers). This will rebuild all networking registry entries, (Only thing it doesn&#8217;t fix is corrupt winsock stack). If you want to find problem export out registry beforehand, and again after you have it fixed. You can then run a filecompare utility to pick up differences. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobkberg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/#comment-44082</link>
		<dc:creator>bobkberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 10:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks again to all for your assistance.  More followup.

As for uninstalling DNS - I doesn&#039;t appear to be possible.  I already tried uninstalling TCP/IP and discovered that it&#039;s not allowed.

As for registry entries - I agree PeterMac - and suspected that it might have been hacked to disable it - the question is how and where.  I&#039;m trying to do comparisons with a clean system also running WinXP Home - but the level and volume of detail is daunting.

The netsh tool is a whole new toybox.  The exact command provided didn&#039;t work, but there&#039;s a LOT to look at there - Thanks VERY much dwiebesick!

Thanks greenie - for the IP articles - I&#039;ll review them as well.

Bob
(a serious tool junkie)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again to all for your assistance.  More followup.</p>
<p>As for uninstalling DNS &#8211; I doesn&#8217;t appear to be possible.  I already tried uninstalling TCP/IP and discovered that it&#8217;s not allowed.</p>
<p>As for registry entries &#8211; I agree PeterMac &#8211; and suspected that it might have been hacked to disable it &#8211; the question is how and where.  I&#8217;m trying to do comparisons with a clean system also running WinXP Home &#8211; but the level and volume of detail is daunting.</p>
<p>The netsh tool is a whole new toybox.  The exact command provided didn&#8217;t work, but there&#8217;s a LOT to look at there &#8211; Thanks VERY much dwiebesick!</p>
<p>Thanks greenie &#8211; for the IP articles &#8211; I&#8217;ll review them as well.</p>
<p>Bob<br />
(a serious tool junkie)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenie</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/#comment-44084</link>
		<dc:creator>greenie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 07:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob,

A few good links for repairing issues with TCP/IP and Winsock on an XP system.

Hope this helps with the repair process.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314067

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811259

I have to take a look at that Sysinternals tool. Sounds like a good one to have.

Greenie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>A few good links for repairing issues with TCP/IP and Winsock on an XP system.</p>
<p>Hope this helps with the repair process.</p>
<p><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314067" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314067</a></p>
<p><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811259" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811259</a></p>
<p>I have to take a look at that Sysinternals tool. Sounds like a good one to have.</p>
<p>Greenie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petermac</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/#comment-44085</link>
		<dc:creator>petermac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 06:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes even Pro&#039;s miss the obvious. If your Hosts file was hacked, probably registry was hacked as well to turn off DNS, and force use of the Hosts file. If so you may well be able to recover just by switching off DNS, with reboot, then switching it Back on. Hopefully will rebuild missing registry entries when it restarts DNS use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes even Pro&#8217;s miss the obvious. If your Hosts file was hacked, probably registry was hacked as well to turn off DNS, and force use of the Hosts file. If so you may well be able to recover just by switching off DNS, with reboot, then switching it Back on. Hopefully will rebuild missing registry entries when it restarts DNS use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobkberg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/#comment-44086</link>
		<dc:creator>bobkberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 00:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More follow-up to your suggestions - and my own investigating.

Yes, I&#039;ve checked the DNS Client, and Yes, it&#039;s running.

I&#039;ve also loaded ntregmon (from the nice people at SysInternals) and watched registry calls go by while doing an nslookup.  This showed that ControlSet001 did not recognize that DNS was there - there was a missing key, and further comparisons with a clean XP Home system showed more.  So at this point, I&#039;ll experiment with the Repair Console.

I&#039;ll try to keep you all up on whatever I find, but any way you look at it, I love a challenge.

Bob
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More follow-up to your suggestions &#8211; and my own investigating.</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve checked the DNS Client, and Yes, it&#8217;s running.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also loaded ntregmon (from the nice people at SysInternals) and watched registry calls go by while doing an nslookup.  This showed that ControlSet001 did not recognize that DNS was there &#8211; there was a missing key, and further comparisons with a clean XP Home system showed more.  So at this point, I&#8217;ll experiment with the Repair Console.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to keep you all up on whatever I find, but any way you look at it, I love a challenge.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobkberg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/#comment-44087</link>
		<dc:creator>bobkberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 23:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sonyfreek - thanks very much for your suggestions

All - One point I should make clear here is that clearing out difficult spyware is one of the things I do for a living, so I (almost) never do a complete rebuild from scratch simply because of the nasties - I take pride in rooting them out (Pun intended).  I use this cleaning activity as &quot;fill-in&quot; work when I don&#039;t have other better paying jobs.  This intended result is that I&#039;m learning a LOT about exactly how spyware works. We&#039;re planning on doing a webcast later this year on the subject of spyware.

All systems I work on get &quot;ghosted&quot; for backup safety, and the first cleaning is done with the &quot;guest&quot; hard disk driven from a known clean system with a combination of Norton Anti-Virus, Ad-aware, Pest Patrol, Microsoft Anti-Spyware, Spybot Search &amp; Destroy, and Safer-Networking&#039;s ADS Locator.

After that, then I reconnect the &quot;guest&quot; system to its own hard drive and allow it to boot, for further cleanup.

As for a rootkit, there didn&#039;t appear to be any, but then it may have been wiped by some of the cleanup utilities

There are a number of error messages in the Event logs about services and such that aren&#039;t starting. DCOM+ in particular - which I think might be related to this.

Neither the hosts nor the LMHOSTS files contain anything that I haven&#039;t put there on purpose.  As sonyfreek points out, the Hosts files works just fine for forcing names - that&#039;s why I&#039;ve been populating it - as a way of testing what&#039;s broken.  It&#039;s DNS that&#039;s not working.

Two things I&#039;m exploring are 1) find the actual cause of this DNS malfunction and 2) Do a clean build of the OS after exporting the legit software registry for later re-import.

Bob
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sonyfreek &#8211; thanks very much for your suggestions</p>
<p>All &#8211; One point I should make clear here is that clearing out difficult spyware is one of the things I do for a living, so I (almost) never do a complete rebuild from scratch simply because of the nasties &#8211; I take pride in rooting them out (Pun intended).  I use this cleaning activity as &#8220;fill-in&#8221; work when I don&#8217;t have other better paying jobs.  This intended result is that I&#8217;m learning a LOT about exactly how spyware works. We&#8217;re planning on doing a webcast later this year on the subject of spyware.</p>
<p>All systems I work on get &#8220;ghosted&#8221; for backup safety, and the first cleaning is done with the &#8220;guest&#8221; hard disk driven from a known clean system with a combination of Norton Anti-Virus, Ad-aware, Pest Patrol, Microsoft Anti-Spyware, Spybot Search &amp; Destroy, and Safer-Networking&#8217;s ADS Locator.</p>
<p>After that, then I reconnect the &#8220;guest&#8221; system to its own hard drive and allow it to boot, for further cleanup.</p>
<p>As for a rootkit, there didn&#8217;t appear to be any, but then it may have been wiped by some of the cleanup utilities</p>
<p>There are a number of error messages in the Event logs about services and such that aren&#8217;t starting. DCOM+ in particular &#8211; which I think might be related to this.</p>
<p>Neither the hosts nor the LMHOSTS files contain anything that I haven&#8217;t put there on purpose.  As sonyfreek points out, the Hosts files works just fine for forcing names &#8211; that&#8217;s why I&#8217;ve been populating it &#8211; as a way of testing what&#8217;s broken.  It&#8217;s DNS that&#8217;s not working.</p>
<p>Two things I&#8217;m exploring are 1) find the actual cause of this DNS malfunction and 2) Do a clean build of the OS after exporting the legit software registry for later re-import.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ve3ofa</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-xp-using-only-nbns-not-dns/#comment-44088</link>
		<dc:creator>ve3ofa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 23:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the services (administrative options/services) do you have the DNS Client Service running? (should be set to AUTO)??

Another quick fix is to delete the Ethernet card from system devices and let the computer find it again.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the services (administrative options/services) do you have the DNS Client Service running? (should be set to AUTO)??</p>
<p>Another quick fix is to delete the Ethernet card from system devices and let the computer find it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/8 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 395/396 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-25 11:28:56 -->