 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows wireless configuruation script</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-wireless-configuruation-script/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-wireless-configuruation-script/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: danieldainty</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-wireless-configuruation-script/#comment-79742</link>
		<dc:creator>danieldainty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Better late than never, eh?

http://innovit-education.co.uk/blogs/daniel-dainty/116-scripting-windows-xp-wireless-configuration]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better late than never, eh?</p>
<p><a href="http://innovit-education.co.uk/blogs/daniel-dainty/116-scripting-windows-xp-wireless-configuration" rel="nofollow">http://innovit-education.co.uk/blogs/daniel-dainty/116-scripting-windows-xp-wireless-configuration</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suzuhara</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-wireless-configuruation-script/#comment-58953</link>
		<dc:creator>suzuhara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-58953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

  At first, KarlG&#039;s solution sounds like a good idea but when you get to think about it, you realise that you should never use it. Mac addresses can be so easily faked and you can sniff an unencrypted wireless network so easily that anyone with a computer could connect to your network.

  MAC addresses should never be used for security, they could be used to determine which ssid they belong to (considering your access-point supports multiple ssid and vlans) but NEVER use it to prevent people from connecting to your network by itself as that can be circumvented in less than 10 seconds by people with little to no knowledge.

 as for the original question, I still haven&#039;t found that answer myself, we are still rolling out ssid by re-imaging the computers (when there are a lot) which is not convenient at all or just manually giving them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>  At first, KarlG&#8217;s solution sounds like a good idea but when you get to think about it, you realise that you should never use it. Mac addresses can be so easily faked and you can sniff an unencrypted wireless network so easily that anyone with a computer could connect to your network.</p>
<p>  MAC addresses should never be used for security, they could be used to determine which ssid they belong to (considering your access-point supports multiple ssid and vlans) but NEVER use it to prevent people from connecting to your network by itself as that can be circumvented in less than 10 seconds by people with little to no knowledge.</p>
<p> as for the original question, I still haven&#8217;t found that answer myself, we are still rolling out ssid by re-imaging the computers (when there are a lot) which is not convenient at all or just manually giving them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 282/285 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 02:18:00 -->