 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why IPv6 is not being used more often</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/why-ipv6-is-not-being-used-more-often/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/why-ipv6-is-not-being-used-more-often/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: sixball</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/why-ipv6-is-not-being-used-more-often/#comment-88281</link>
		<dc:creator>sixball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-88281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another great reason to not take the IPv6 plunge is that they dont need to yet.. If you ALREADY have a stable, Public IPv4 IP address that you&#039;re NAT&#039;ing through-out your location, why bother? All your internal equipment is probably running a private IP scheme now anyways, so why reinvent the wheel when this ones working for ya?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great reason to not take the IPv6 plunge is that they dont need to yet.. If you ALREADY have a stable, Public IPv4 IP address that you&#8217;re NAT&#8217;ing through-out your location, why bother? All your internal equipment is probably running a private IP scheme now anyways, so why reinvent the wheel when this ones working for ya?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattmather</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/why-ipv6-is-not-being-used-more-often/#comment-80286</link>
		<dc:creator>mattmather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-80286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally I would say fear and a lack of understanding.

My opinion is we will change when we absolutely have to and there is no choice. Service providers are as guilty of this as small companies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I would say fear and a lack of understanding.</p>
<p>My opinion is we will change when we absolutely have to and there is no choice. Service providers are as guilty of this as small companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technochic</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/why-ipv6-is-not-being-used-more-often/#comment-80194</link>
		<dc:creator>technochic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-80194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect lack of knowledge, lack of supporting hardware, and fear of change :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect lack of knowledge, lack of supporting hardware, and fear of change <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 300/303 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 09:55:25 -->