<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which is faster? SAN or DASD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/which-is-faster-san-or-dasd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/which-is-faster-san-or-dasd/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:55:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: pressler2904</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/which-is-faster-san-or-dasd/#comment-53639</link>
		<dc:creator>pressler2904</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The key to the issue, as Jinteik says is &quot;Which is faster will all depend on your workload and configuration.&quot;  

If you have more than one server connecting to the SAN, you&#039;ll see raw throughput decreased.  Also, you will benefit by using an HBA with a TCP/IP offload ASIC onboard, otherwise there is a good chance that your throughput will be throttled at either your processor or your NIC.

I&#039;ve seen situations where DAS is indeed faster...  The advantages of SAN storage are many, even if there may be a slight performance hit in day to day usage.

What type of application are you looking at here?  Is this messaging? database? general F&amp;P?  If you are looking at database storage, make sure you configure your ethernet adapter/HBA to handle data appropriately (you may need to adjust your max frame size).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to the issue, as Jinteik says is &#8220;Which is faster will all depend on your workload and configuration.&#8221;  </p>
<p>If you have more than one server connecting to the SAN, you&#8217;ll see raw throughput decreased.  Also, you will benefit by using an HBA with a TCP/IP offload ASIC onboard, otherwise there is a good chance that your throughput will be throttled at either your processor or your NIC.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen situations where DAS is indeed faster&#8230;  The advantages of SAN storage are many, even if there may be a slight performance hit in day to day usage.</p>
<p>What type of application are you looking at here?  Is this messaging? database? general F&amp;P?  If you are looking at database storage, make sure you configure your ethernet adapter/HBA to handle data appropriately (you may need to adjust your max frame size).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.035 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 267/273 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-20 09:16:36 -->