 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where is the problem? HBA? Host cache? Queue Depth? Execution Throttle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/where-is-the-problem-hba-host-cache-queue-depth-execution-throttle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/where-is-the-problem-hba-host-cache-queue-depth-execution-throttle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:27:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: miz</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/where-is-the-problem-hba-host-cache-queue-depth-execution-throttle/#comment-72783</link>
		<dc:creator>miz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-72783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand you mention Emulex working better in your case than QLogic, but what is the disk configuration like? 
Do you have a value from perfmon for parameters like:
Logical/Physical Disk: Avg. Disk sec/Transfer
Logical/Physical Disk: Avg. Disk Queue Length
Per haps you have a disk bottleneck that not even the Emulex card can resolve...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand you mention Emulex working better in your case than QLogic, but what is the disk configuration like?<br />
Do you have a value from perfmon for parameters like:<br />
Logical/Physical Disk: Avg. Disk sec/Transfer<br />
Logical/Physical Disk: Avg. Disk Queue Length<br />
Per haps you have a disk bottleneck that not even the Emulex card can resolve&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jldd</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/where-is-the-problem-hba-host-cache-queue-depth-execution-throttle/#comment-72745</link>
		<dc:creator>jldd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-72745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for responding Hater.
We have only 1 Exchange-2K7 in a cluster, Active-Passive.
We are running TMEA, which is an HDS tool that collect, continuously, PerfMon data, aggreg them in a MS-SQL analyzer server, and we can graphs many many graphs as well as making ScoreCards. In Dell testing they say they used ESE.dll file version 8.1.240.5.
I do not know the version at that customer. Is this something I need to check for the most recent version for QMH2462 in a W2K8-x64 and Exchange 2K7-SP1? Because it seems the host is &quot;reluctant&quot; to push I/Os... only when we set Execution Throttle to 65,000!!! Weird.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for responding Hater.<br />
We have only 1 Exchange-2K7 in a cluster, Active-Passive.<br />
We are running TMEA, which is an HDS tool that collect, continuously, PerfMon data, aggreg them in a MS-SQL analyzer server, and we can graphs many many graphs as well as making ScoreCards. In Dell testing they say they used ESE.dll file version 8.1.240.5.<br />
I do not know the version at that customer. Is this something I need to check for the most recent version for QMH2462 in a W2K8-x64 and Exchange 2K7-SP1? Because it seems the host is &#8220;reluctant&#8221; to push I/Os&#8230; only when we set Execution Throttle to 65,000!!! Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 282/285 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-23 01:08:32 -->