Mrdenny 
46795 pts. | Apr 9 2008 12:18AM GMT
Check out my SQL Server blog “SQL Server with Mr Denny” for more SQL Server information.
Q:
When designing a data warehouse in SQL Server what is the best setting for the varchar data type?
I am designing a data warehouse database to be implemented in SQL Server. There are a number of variable length character fields for which I intend to use the varchar field type. On previous data warehouse implementations in Oracle, I frequently set the length for the varchar fields higher than the current data length. I did this so that if the source changes to a longer field in the future, it will not be necessary to update the database. Is there any reason not to do this for a SQL Server database? One example would be, if the actual data field is now up to 10 characters, but I want to make the field type varchar (25) in case the source changes to a larger field in the future. Will this have any negative performance implications?
ASKED:
Apr 8 2008 11:14 PM GMT
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
A:
RATE THIS ANSWER
0
Click to Vote:
0
Click to Vote:
- 0
0
If you set all the columns to 1000 characters you could end up with some problems. Are these your DIMs for FACTs? How many rows are we talking about here?
I've never found that a slightly larger field is a problem.
