Question

  Asked: Apr 8 2008   11:14 PM GMT
  Asked by: SQL Server Ask the Experts


When designing a data warehouse in SQL Server what is the best setting for the varchar data type?


SQL Server data warehousing/business intelligence

I am designing a data warehouse database to be implemented in SQL Server. There are a number of variable length character fields for which I intend to use the varchar field type. On previous data warehouse implementations in Oracle, I frequently set the length for the varchar fields higher than the current data length. I did this so that if the source changes to a longer field in the future, it will not be necessary to update the database. Is there any reason not to do this for a SQL Server database? One example would be, if the actual data field is now up to 10 characters, but I want to make the field type varchar (25) in case the source changes to a larger field in the future. Will this have any negative performance implications?

Subscribe to Alerts! Get questions and answers delivered to your Inbox.


E-mail me updates on this question



   SUBSCRIBE

hidden modal window

Answer Wiki (Improve, edit or add to this answer)


 RATE THIS ANSWER
0
Click to Vote:
  •   0
  •  0



There shouldn't be any negative performance issues as long as you don't go nuts. Just make sure that you don't go over your max record length of 8060 bytes.

If you set all the columns to 1000 characters you could end up with some problems. Are these your DIMs for FACTs? How many rows are we talking about here?

I've never found that a slightly larger field is a problem.
  • AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Browse more Questions and Answers on SQL Server.

Looking for relevant SQL Server Whitepapers? Visit the SearchSQLServer.com Research Library.


Discuss This Answer


You must be logged-in to discuss a question. Log-in/Register

Mrdenny  |   Apr 9 2008  12:18AM GMT

Check out my SQL Server blog “SQL Server with Mr Denny” for more SQL Server information.