You can measure LAN and WAN throughput using lots of different tools, but two free tools are ping and iPerf. Network testing expert Kevin Tolly shows <a href="http://searchenterprisewan.techtarget.com/tip/Measuring-WAN-Latency">how to measure WAN latency</a> using ping and how to read <a href="http://searchenterprisewan.techtarget.com/tip/Ping-latency-test-results-How-slow-is-your-WAN-link">ping test results</a> in these two articles. He also teaches you <a href="http://searchenterprisewan.techtarget.com/tip/How-to-use-iPerf-to-measure-throughput">how to use iPerf to measure throughput</a> in this article.
Last Wiki Answer Submitted: April 16, 2012 3:37 pm by Tessa Parmenter440 pts.
If you live outside the United States, by submitting your email address you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States.
“Why wouldn’t I be able to use ping or iPerf for different OS?“, the ans might be known to u. Again u didn’t mention which diffs OS u r using…. is this a mixed env ! like Linux, Winds various vers etc. etc. guessing if Linux is there, so take a special care about SAMBA. If there r only Wind flavours, then check cable, nic first then go for next….
Rechil, do you always post from your mobile phone ?
That is the only reason I cant think of for your excessive use of abbreviations. It looks very unprofessional (at least to me), and I find it very strange since you have a blogger badge.
A valid test would also be installing wireshark on a client or using wireshark portable and running a file upload/download from that client to another system. Capture only traffic between the two hosts involved (or capture everything and then run a display filter as needed). Wireshark has built-in statistics reports that can give you a very good idea of throughput and problems on the link between the client and servers.
A good start on finding out more on Wireshark can be the blog postings here on ITKE or Laura Chappel’s excellent Wireshark book.
Which OS u r using now and versions ! This is required for ans. There r no of tools (both free / cost) for diff OS.
We’re using Windows7. Why wouldn’t I be able to use ping or iPerf for different OS?
“Why wouldn’t I be able to use ping or iPerf for different OS?“, the ans might be known to u. Again u didn’t mention which diffs OS u r using…. is this a mixed env ! like Linux, Winds various vers etc. etc. guessing if Linux is there, so take a special care about SAMBA. If there r only Wind flavours, then check cable, nic first then go for next….
Rechil, do you always post from your mobile phone ?
That is the only reason I cant think of for your excessive use of abbreviations. It looks very unprofessional (at least to me), and I find it very strange since you have a blogger badge.
BTW, as far as I know, iPerf is available for Windows and Linux, so both tools mentioned by TessaLP can be used in any of those OSes.
See this blog entry for a good understanding of capacity vs throughput.
A valid test would also be installing wireshark on a client or using wireshark portable and running a file upload/download from that client to another system. Capture only traffic between the two hosts involved (or capture everything and then run a display filter as needed). Wireshark has built-in statistics reports that can give you a very good idea of throughput and problems on the link between the client and servers.
A good start on finding out more on Wireshark can be the blog postings here on ITKE or Laura Chappel’s excellent Wireshark book.
I also meant to put a search link to the ITKE blogs which refer to Wireshark.
This time with the link to the ITKE blogs.