 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What can be used instead of SNDNETSPLF to send spooled file from one queue to another queue on the same AS/400 system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-can-be-used-instead-of-sndnetsplf-to-send-spooled-file-from-one-queue-to-another-queue-on-the-same-as400-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-can-be-used-instead-of-sndnetsplf-to-send-spooled-file-from-one-queue-to-another-queue-on-the-same-as400-system/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tomliotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-can-be-used-instead-of-sndnetsplf-to-send-spooled-file-from-one-queue-to-another-queue-on-the-same-as400-system/#comment-81443</link>
		<dc:creator>tomliotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-81443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;...because we have two systems (production and backup) with the same system name.&lt;/i&gt;

Obviously, that&#039;s the problem. Why would you want even to try having two active systems on the same network that apparently need to communicate with other while having the same names? The names are used for communication, so having the same names is always a problem... unless one system is off-line, which would make transferring spooled files tricky anyway.

If you have reasons for being set up that way, we might provide alternative solutions if you can tell us why.

In any case, you should be able to use SNDTCPSPLF instead of SNDNETSPLF.

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230;because we have two systems (production and backup) with the same system name.</i></p>
<p>Obviously, that&#8217;s the problem. Why would you want even to try having two active systems on the same network that apparently need to communicate with other while having the same names? The names are used for communication, so having the same names is always a problem&#8230; unless one system is off-line, which would make transferring spooled files tricky anyway.</p>
<p>If you have reasons for being set up that way, we might provide alternative solutions if you can tell us why.</p>
<p>In any case, you should be able to use SNDTCPSPLF instead of SNDNETSPLF.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilly400</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-can-be-used-instead-of-sndnetsplf-to-send-spooled-file-from-one-queue-to-another-queue-on-the-same-as400-system/#comment-57444</link>
		<dc:creator>gilly400</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

You could set up a remote outq to point to the other system and use CHGSPLFA to move the spooled file to that queue or SNDNETSPLF to send it to the other queue (on the local system).

Regards,

Martin Gilbert.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>You could set up a remote outq to point to the other system and use CHGSPLFA to move the spooled file to that queue or SNDNETSPLF to send it to the other queue (on the local system).</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Martin Gilbert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philpl1jb</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-can-be-used-instead-of-sndnetsplf-to-send-spooled-file-from-one-queue-to-another-queue-on-the-same-as400-system/#comment-57426</link>
		<dc:creator>philpl1jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[between two outq&#039;s in the same partition?  Change Spooled File Attributes (CHGSPLFA)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>between two outq&#8217;s in the same partition?  Change Spooled File Attributes (CHGSPLFA)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tpinky</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-can-be-used-instead-of-sndnetsplf-to-send-spooled-file-from-one-queue-to-another-queue-on-the-same-as400-system/#comment-57422</link>
		<dc:creator>tpinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, if you have TAATOOL you can do a DUPSPLF. This duplicates the spool file and you can send to another queue. 

...TPinky]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, if you have TAATOOL you can do a DUPSPLF. This duplicates the spool file and you can send to another queue. </p>
<p>&#8230;TPinky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickmcd</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-can-be-used-instead-of-sndnetsplf-to-send-spooled-file-from-one-queue-to-another-queue-on-the-same-as400-system/#comment-57420</link>
		<dc:creator>rickmcd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you use the save restore functions I forgot to mention to save to a save file then ftp to other partition to do the restore.....Rick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use the save restore functions I forgot to mention to save to a save file then ftp to other partition to do the restore&#8230;..Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.045 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 323/329 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-22 15:55:51 -->