<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VPN tunnel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-tunnel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-tunnel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:25:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: labnuke99</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-tunnel/#comment-51874</link>
		<dc:creator>labnuke99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That latency is to be expected also if you are using VPN encryption. That will add overhead to the already high latency due to the distance and buffering between US &amp; Australia. This latency seems to be pretty much within norms as I have sites in Thailand and Singapore and from the US the latency is between 290 &amp; 390msec.

It is possible that you are overloading the link and as previously mentioned that will cause higher latency. You can use a tool like iperf to measure throughput and window sizes to see if some tuning on endpoints could help with throughput. 

Are you concerned about the latency issues or throughput? High latency is normal when the endpoints are far apart. Throughput is a function of latency and bandwidth. Adding more bandwidth won&#039;t necessarily solve any issues if latency is still high (as is typical when the endpoints are halfway around the world from each other). Unfortunately the data path has to go around the globe rather than through it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That latency is to be expected also if you are using VPN encryption. That will add overhead to the already high latency due to the distance and buffering between US &amp; Australia. This latency seems to be pretty much within norms as I have sites in Thailand and Singapore and from the US the latency is between 290 &amp; 390msec.</p>
<p>It is possible that you are overloading the link and as previously mentioned that will cause higher latency. You can use a tool like iperf to measure throughput and window sizes to see if some tuning on endpoints could help with throughput. </p>
<p>Are you concerned about the latency issues or throughput? High latency is normal when the endpoints are far apart. Throughput is a function of latency and bandwidth. Adding more bandwidth won&#8217;t necessarily solve any issues if latency is still high (as is typical when the endpoints are halfway around the world from each other). Unfortunately the data path has to go around the globe rather than through it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.035 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 267/273 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-19 09:50:47 -->