<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VPN: LAN access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-lan-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-lan-access/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:51:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-lan-access/#comment-112938</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-lan-access/#comment-112938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;EM&gt;...I don’t want to hack anything and I don’t want to make somthing not ethical…&lt;/EM&gt;
&#160;
We don&#039;t think you intend anything like that, but it should be clear that it could be interpreted as unethical by your customer. Your obligation is to avoid even &lt;STRONG&gt;the appearance&lt;/STRONG&gt; of unethical behavior.
&#160;
&lt;EM&gt;I was thinking if it is passible to split my network and connect to VPN in one portion and continue working on internet in the other one,...&lt;/EM&gt;
&#160;
Splitting your network is not the same as having your single system actively holding two different connections. That is specifically what the customer&#039;s policy forbids for whatever reason. You&#039;re stuck with&#160;respecting that requirement regardless of the inconvenience, or it&#039;ll become &quot;unethical&quot;.
&#160;
Respecting customer policies is part of ethics. Circumventing this policy probably&#160;isn&#039;t illegal and perhaps isn&#039;t even morally wrong. But because it goes against customer expectations, it is &quot;unethical&quot;, i.e., outside of ethical.
&#160;
A second system, perhaps a virtual one, seems to be a reasonableresolution.
&#160;
Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8230;I don’t want to hack anything and I don’t want to make somthing not ethical…</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
We don&#8217;t think you intend anything like that, but it should be clear that it could be interpreted as unethical by your customer. Your obligation is to avoid even <strong>the appearance</strong> of unethical behavior.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<em>I was thinking if it is passible to split my network and connect to VPN in one portion and continue working on internet in the other one,&#8230;</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
Splitting your network is not the same as having your single system actively holding two different connections. That is specifically what the customer&#8217;s policy forbids for whatever reason. You&#8217;re stuck with&nbsp;respecting that requirement regardless of the inconvenience, or it&#8217;ll become &#8220;unethical&#8221;.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Respecting customer policies is part of ethics. Circumventing this policy probably&nbsp;isn&#8217;t illegal and perhaps isn&#8217;t even morally wrong. But because it goes against customer expectations, it is &#8220;unethical&#8221;, i.e., outside of ethical.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
A second system, perhaps a virtual one, seems to be a reasonableresolution.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webluca</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-lan-access/#comment-112927</link>
		<dc:creator>webluca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-lan-access/#comment-112927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course I don&#039;t want to hack anything and I don&#039;t want to make somthing not ethical... I was thinking if it is passible to split my network and connect to VPN in one portion and continue working on internet in the other one, or something similar. I made something similar using windows virtual pc, but I don&#039;t need an entire virtual machine, it&#039;s enought to have a virtual adapter...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course I don&#8217;t want to hack anything and I don&#8217;t want to make somthing not ethical&#8230; I was thinking if it is passible to split my network and connect to VPN in one portion and continue working on internet in the other one, or something similar. I made something similar using windows virtual pc, but I don&#8217;t need an entire virtual machine, it&#8217;s enought to have a virtual adapter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigKat</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-lan-access/#comment-112915</link>
		<dc:creator>BigKat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-lan-access/#comment-112915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You want a work-around?&#160;&#160;The only one we&#039;ll provide, as this is an ethical website,&#160;is to have a second (perhaps older) PC running that is logged into the Internet.&#160; You can browze and email from there to your heart&#039;s content without having to hack your customer&#039;s network and policies.
And if I was your customer and you knowingly circumvented my network, the best you could hope for is the loss of my business.&#160; Think lawsuits!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want a work-around?&nbsp;&nbsp;The only one we&#8217;ll provide, as this is an ethical website,&nbsp;is to have a second (perhaps older) PC running that is logged into the Internet.&nbsp; You can browze and email from there to your heart&#8217;s content without having to hack your customer&#8217;s network and policies.<br />
And if I was your customer and you knowingly circumvented my network, the best you could hope for is the loss of my business.&nbsp; Think lawsuits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-lan-access/#comment-112911</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vpn-lan-access/#comment-112911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;EM&gt;The VPN administrator told me that the VPN is configured in this way and the rule cannot be modified for policy reason.&lt;/EM&gt;
&#160;
If it is policy and set by an administrator, we can&#039;t help to circumvent it. A policy setting would probably have a valid business reason (especially if it&#039;s a known setting). However, if a vulnerability is found that leaves a hole open, we&#039;ll gladly help the administrator close it.
&#160;
Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The VPN administrator told me that the VPN is configured in this way and the rule cannot be modified for policy reason.</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
If it is policy and set by an administrator, we can&#8217;t help to circumvent it. A policy setting would probably have a valid business reason (especially if it&#8217;s a known setting). However, if a vulnerability is found that leaves a hole open, we&#8217;ll gladly help the administrator close it.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 310/313 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-19 10:22:14 -->