Question

  Asked: Jul 22 2008   2:04 PM GMT
  Asked by: JimmyIT


VMWare ESX What are the advantages in booting from a SAN


VMware ESX, SAN, VMware

What are the advantages in booting VMWare ESX from a SAN. Are there any potential issues i should expect?

Thanks

Subscribe to Alerts! Get questions and answers delivered to your Inbox.


E-mail me updates on this question



   SUBSCRIBE

hidden modal window

Answer Wiki (Improve, edit or add to this answer)


 RATE THIS ANSWER
+2
Click to Vote:
  •   2
  •  0



One of the ways enterprises today with large numbers of servers are reducing costs and enable greater storage consolidation is by deploying diskless servers that boot from the SAN (FC or IP). While this technique is not new, the introduction of the Bladeserver, which provides greater manageability, reduced HW costs, simpler cable management as well as providing power, cooling and real-estate savings, has further accelerate the adoption of SAN booting.

Booting from the SAN provides several advantages:


* Disaster Recovery - Boot images stored on disk arrays can be easily replicated to remote sites where standby servers of the same HW type can boot quickly, minimizing the negative effect a disaster can have to the business.
* Snapshots - Boot images in shapshots can be quickly reverted back to a point-in-time, saving time and money in rebuilding a server from scratch.
* Quick deployment of Servers - Master Boot images stored on disk arrays can be easily cloned using Netapp's FlexClone capabilities providing rapid deployment of additional physical servers.
* Centralized Management - Because the Master image is located in the SAN, upgrades and patches are managed centrally and are installed only on the master boot image which can be then cloned and mapped to the various servers. No more multiple upgrades or patch installs.
* Greater Storage consolidation - Because the boot image resides in the SAN, there is no need to purchase internal drives.
* Greater Protection - Disk arrays provide greater data protection, availability and resiliency features than servers. For example, Netapp's RAID-DP functionality provides additional protection in the event of a Dual drive failure. RAID-DP with SyncMirror, also protects against disk drive enclosure failure, Loop failure, cable failure, back-end HBA failure or any 4 concurrent drive failures

Having mentioned the advantages, it's only fair that we also mention the disadvantages which even though are being outnumbered they still exist:

* Complexity - SAN Booting is a more complex process than booting from an internal drive. In certain cases, the troubleshooting process may be a bit more difficult especially if a coredump file can not be obtained.
* Variable Requirements - The requirements and support from array vendor to array vendor will vary and specific configurations may not even be supported. The requirements will also vary based on the type of OS that is being loaded. Always consult with the disk array vendor before you decide to boot from the fabric.

One of the most popular platforms that lends itself to booting from the SAN is VMware ESX server 3.0.0. One reason is that VMware does not support booting from internal IDE or SATA drives. The second reason is that more and more enterprises have started to deploy ESX 3.0.0 on diskless blade servers consolidating hundreds of physical servers into few blades in a single blade chassis with the deployment of VMware's server virtualization capabilities.

__
Another point to consider is that every server needs a LUN zoned exclusively for its boot disk, and some vendors license their SAN by zones (like IBM's DS4000).

Generally, since most VMWare ESX boot images are fairly consistent and can not be shared between servers, you don't find them booting on SAN much. People prefer to have local disk when possible instead of more expensive (and complicated) SAN boot disk space.
  • AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Browse more Questions and Answers on Virtualization and Storage.

Looking for relevant Virtualization Whitepapers? Visit the SearchServerVirtualization.com Research Library.


Discuss This Answer


You must be logged-in to discuss a question. Log-in/Register

Esiebert7625  |   Jul 23 2008  8:18PM GMT

I think you’ll find that most users do not use boot from SAN except for special situations like with blade servers that have no local disk available. Booting from SAN can be problematic and adds complexity to your hosts. There are also advantages to having local disk in your host servers, especially if you have a SAN failure.