Pikupiku742
20 pts. | Aug 15 2009 9:00AM GMT
I have configured the lan port of the router with an ip. which is in the same subnet of vlan 1 and the passport’s lan port.
you are telling that i need to create virtual interfaces in the router.ok but at that time i have to give the ips of the vlans in the subinterfaces of the router.
that means the intervlan routing would happend on the router itself. Now i don’t need a L3 switch l2 would do the perpose.
so using l3 is a west.
but i have to use the l3 over here.
and at the same time vlans are not only talking to each other but also every vlan can ping the router interface. in that case i probably don’t need a trunk route.
but still i would try that once.
don’t take it otherwise I am just discussing.
plz advice me.
thanks.
BlankReg
11280 pts. | Aug 19 2009 7:52AM GMT
If you want the router to send and receive OSPF then you need IP addresses in the subnets that you want to propogate to other routers.
If you don’t want the router to do the inter-vlan routing, then you can put access lists on each sub interface to stop that happening. But if you already allow inter-vlan routing on the L3 switch, you don’t need to prevent it on the router. If the router is providing the OSPF information to the Passport, then the packets must route via the router, so it needs to be either the gateway for each subnet (VLAN) or there needs to be static routes on the L3 switch, to say that the router is the path towards the Passport.
I think you may be better off just configuring some static routing on the Passport, for each of these VLANs, and not complicate it with the router and OSPF. If there are not too many VLANs, and they don’t change, then I think that may be the better option for you. The Passport should be able to put these subnets into OSPF if there are other devices in the network that need to have access to or from these subnets.
Just another thought.






