Home > IT Answers > DataCenter > Virtualization Product Choices
Chunter
110 pts.
 Virtualization Product Choices
AMD, CentOS, Data Center management, Linux Distributions, VirtualBox, Virtualization technologies, Windows XP, Xen
I will be setting up my new system in a couple of weeks. I'll be running CentOS 5 on a quad core AMD Opteron. I'm going to run Windows XP as a guest OS, and possibly 1 or more Linux distros. Does anyone have any suggestions? I am currently considering Xen or Virtualbox, leaning towards Xen.

Software/Hardware used:
ASKED: July 24, 2008  5:54 PM
UPDATED: November 23, 2008  12:47 PM
RELATED QUESTIONS
Answer Wiki:
From my experience, XEN has been the best. I have only done very limited virtualization, but XEN has handled all virtualization we have done thusfar. This includes XP, Vista, and a few Linux Distros as well.
Last Wiki Answer Submitted:  July 28, 2008  3:43 pm  by  Schmidtw   11,220 pts.
All Answer Wiki Contributors:  Schmidtw   11,220 pts.
To see all answers submitted to the Answer Wiki: View Answer History.


RSS - Discussions Help
Discuss This Question:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

 

I recommend you to try all available choices before making decision.

Xen is a CPU virtualization and is the most ‘lightweight’. Currently there are 2 major Xen implementations:
- open source (included in some Linux distributions)
- commercial XenDesktop Express (with free version available for up to 2xCPU sockets, 4G RAM, 4x guest OSes): http://citrix.com/English/ps2/products/product.asp?contentID=163057

Commercial version should be more Windows-guest friendly. It has unified ‘Virtualization Management Console’ and most easy to use.

I have no experience with Xen and Windows guest (because my CPU doesn’t have virtualization features). I used open source Xen on Linux with Linux guest – it was very stable.

VirtualBox is a hardware virtualization and quite heavy. I’m using it now for running all my guest OSes, sometimes it’s quite slow, but faster than vmware. I have no problems with it on Windows guest.
There are also 2 VirtualBox implementations: open source edition (VirtualBox OSE) and commercial (just called VirtualBox, it’s also free but only in binaries): http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Editions
Making NIC work on guest at the same network segment as host is a little tricky, but possible. On commercial version there are tools for network configuration, that are absent on OSE, so I recommend you commercial.

Nopius
 115 pts.
 

Hi,

Are there many other alternatives worth looking at?

Regards,

Martin Gilbert.

Gilly400
 23,625 pts.
 

let’s try ESXi –> it’s free and very complete: no other product can compete with vmware (IMO).
Manlio
My virtualization Blog

Virtualaleph
 65 pts.