 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transferring from V4R5 to V6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/v4r5-to-v6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/v4r5-to-v6/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:27:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: The Most-Watched IT Questions: September 6, 2011 - ITKE Community Blog</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/v4r5-to-v6/#comment-96202</link>
		<dc:creator>The Most-Watched IT Questions: September 6, 2011 - ITKE Community Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-96202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 8. Check out CharlieBrowne&#8217;s approved answer on transferring from V4R5 to V6. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8. Check out CharlieBrowne&#8217;s approved answer on transferring from V4R5 to V6. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomliotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/v4r5-to-v6/#comment-95837</link>
		<dc:creator>tomliotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-95837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the two systems can communicate via FTP, then it could be feasible to use ObjectConnect. I haven&#039;t seen it used between systems separated by that many releases, though. Also, APPN configuration would need to be done enough for at least those two systems to communicate through it.

Using ObjectConnect would mostly eliminate creating and populating savefiles on either side. Depending on space restrictions, that might be useful. It could also cut a significant amount of network time (perhaps especially if multiple libraries were processed concurrently).

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the two systems can communicate via FTP, then it could be feasible to use ObjectConnect. I haven&#8217;t seen it used between systems separated by that many releases, though. Also, APPN configuration would need to be done enough for at least those two systems to communicate through it.</p>
<p>Using ObjectConnect would mostly eliminate creating and populating savefiles on either side. Depending on space restrictions, that might be useful. It could also cut a significant amount of network time (perhaps especially if multiple libraries were processed concurrently).</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomliotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/v4r5-to-v6/#comment-95836</link>
		<dc:creator>tomliotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-95836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To FTP a savefile between two AS/400s, it&#039;s not necessary to create the savefile first on the target system as long as NAMEFMT 1 is used. After opening a connection and logging on, the command sequence might look like:&lt;pre&gt;
bin
na 1
put mysavefile.savf&lt;/pre&gt;
Savefiles are always transferred in binary mode, so the {bin} command is necessary. Switching to NAMEFMT 1 with the {na 1} command lets the target system recognize the .SAVF file extension. Then {put mysavefile.savf} is understood by the target system as a special kind of file -- a savefile.

The automatic handling of a savefile also eliminates the use of {(REPLACE}, so be aware that there will be no warning if a savefile is overwritten.

If the default is set for NAMEFMT 1 or if previous commands have already caused NAMEFMT 1 to be enabled, then it&#039;s not necessary to ask for it. However, I always ask explicitly for a NAMEFMT setting.

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To FTP a savefile between two AS/400s, it&#8217;s not necessary to create the savefile first on the target system as long as NAMEFMT 1 is used. After opening a connection and logging on, the command sequence might look like:
<pre>
bin
na 1
put mysavefile.savf</pre>
<p>Savefiles are always transferred in binary mode, so the {bin} command is necessary. Switching to NAMEFMT 1 with the {na 1} command lets the target system recognize the .SAVF file extension. Then {put mysavefile.savf} is understood by the target system as a special kind of file &#8212; a savefile.</p>
<p>The automatic handling of a savefile also eliminates the use of {(REPLACE}, so be aware that there will be no warning if a savefile is overwritten.</p>
<p>If the default is set for NAMEFMT 1 or if previous commands have already caused NAMEFMT 1 to be enabled, then it&#8217;s not necessary to ask for it. However, I always ask explicitly for a NAMEFMT setting.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charliebrowne</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/v4r5-to-v6/#comment-95811</link>
		<dc:creator>charliebrowne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-95811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Create a *SAVF (what ever you want to call it)
2. SAVLIB xxx *SAVF (the above *SAVF you just created)
3. FTP it to the target box
4. On the target box do RSTLIB xxx *SAVF 
*
I do not remember if you need to create the *SAVF on the target box and use (Replace on the FTP command.

Depending on how much you have to do, repeat this process for each library or write a program to do it.

You can also create a new library and your *SAVFs in it, then SAV that LIB and FTP a single time]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Create a *SAVF (what ever you want to call it)<br />
2. SAVLIB xxx *SAVF (the above *SAVF you just created)<br />
3. FTP it to the target box<br />
4. On the target box do RSTLIB xxx *SAVF<br />
*<br />
I do not remember if you need to create the *SAVF on the target box and use (Replace on the FTP command.</p>
<p>Depending on how much you have to do, repeat this process for each library or write a program to do it.</p>
<p>You can also create a new library and your *SAVFs in it, then SAV that LIB and FTP a single time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajasekhar15</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/v4r5-to-v6/#comment-95794</link>
		<dc:creator>rajasekhar15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-95794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no charlie we dont have tape option here, that&#039;s why i asking for FTP option....thanks in advance]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no charlie we dont have tape option here, that&#8217;s why i asking for FTP option&#8230;.thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/8 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 325/326 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-22 19:20:07 -->