Carlosdl
29855 pts. | Jul 30 2009 1:59PM GMT
I guess Meandyou is right, but if the question had been answered paying strict attention to the words, I guess the answer would have been a simple NO.
Maybe the question asker did not use the proper words for what he needed. Who knows.
mrdenny
46810 pts. | Jul 31 2009 7:54PM GMT
The odds of someone knowing the difference between SQL, T/SQL, PL/SQL etc is minimal in most cases. If they had asked for an ANSI SQL solution to the problem, then obviously there isn’t one.
It is extremely common for people who are working with databases (SQL Server, DB2, etc) to simply refer to the language they use as SQL. Is this accurate? No. Is it common place? Yes. Does that mean that the users should be beat down with semantics? No.
People go to forum sites to get an answer to a question that is causing them problems. In a lot of cases English isn’t there first language (and I have no idea if that is the case here) so trying to get across the concept that ANSI SQL and SQL are different and that they should be references as such is a loosing battle which will simply make the users not come back.
If this person needed more clarification they can simply ask for more clarification. Either this person got the answer they needed, they didn’t need the answer any more, or they forgot they posted the question here.






