 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unable to access windows 95 sharing files from windows xp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unable-to-access-windows-95-sharing-files-from-windows-xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unable-to-access-windows-95-sharing-files-from-windows-xp/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:21:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: sketch8014</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unable-to-access-windows-95-sharing-files-from-windows-xp/#comment-43671</link>
		<dc:creator>sketch8014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears as though you may not have configured the share permissions on the Win 95 correctly. The error message &quot;Access denied&quot; suggest that you see the share however you do not have permission to view the files. Kinda like knocking on the door to a private party. You know the party is active,but you do not have a card to swipe and the proprieter left no message at the door to let you in once you identify yourself. So back to Win 95 question...Open control panel, go to passwords and enter a user account that exists on both XP and Win 95. See if that helps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears as though you may not have configured the share permissions on the Win 95 correctly. The error message &#8220;Access denied&#8221; suggest that you see the share however you do not have permission to view the files. Kinda like knocking on the door to a private party. You know the party is active,but you do not have a card to swipe and the proprieter left no message at the door to let you in once you identify yourself. So back to Win 95 question&#8230;Open control panel, go to passwords and enter a user account that exists on both XP and Win 95. See if that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texasboy</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unable-to-access-windows-95-sharing-files-from-windows-xp/#comment-43672</link>
		<dc:creator>texasboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve gotten some great information in your replies to this question; however, I would like to offer additional information for your consideration. Windows 9x (95a, 95b, 98, 98SE, ME) will create network issues on your domain. Win 9x boxes always want to be the Master Browser and will &#039;fight to the death&#039; to get that role! It will force an election for Master Browser whenever it has the chance. On the other hand, your AD structure wants the domain controllers to have this role. The problem becomes this never ending cycle of Browser elections which causes undue network traffic and network resources that are intermittent. If you decide to keep your Win95 in place, make sure that you disable its Master Browser ability. You can find information about how to do this by reading the information Microsoft has provided at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q134304/
You don&#039;t state a reason for the Win95 to stay on your network (such as legacy software that can&#039;t be run on new XPs), so I would highly recommend that you get rid of it and put the Win95 shares on a network node elsewhere. You can use &#039;hacks&#039; and &#039;work arounds&#039; but remember that Windows 9x was never designed to be on a legitimate network.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve gotten some great information in your replies to this question; however, I would like to offer additional information for your consideration. Windows 9x (95a, 95b, 98, 98SE, ME) will create network issues on your domain. Win 9x boxes always want to be the Master Browser and will &#8216;fight to the death&#8217; to get that role! It will force an election for Master Browser whenever it has the chance. On the other hand, your AD structure wants the domain controllers to have this role. The problem becomes this never ending cycle of Browser elections which causes undue network traffic and network resources that are intermittent. If you decide to keep your Win95 in place, make sure that you disable its Master Browser ability. You can find information about how to do this by reading the information Microsoft has provided at <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q134304/" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q134304/</a><br />
You don&#8217;t state a reason for the Win95 to stay on your network (such as legacy software that can&#8217;t be run on new XPs), so I would highly recommend that you get rid of it and put the Win95 shares on a network node elsewhere. You can use &#8216;hacks&#8217; and &#8216;work arounds&#8217; but remember that Windows 9x was never designed to be on a legitimate network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankdc</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unable-to-access-windows-95-sharing-files-from-windows-xp/#comment-43673</link>
		<dc:creator>frankdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 07:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howard-
thanks for the explanation, that&#039;s exactly what is going on in my mixed network as well. I have a Win2K server as well as WinXP Pro clients; which group policies could I enable to allow the XP&#039;s to continue to access the win98&#039;s I will still have to run for a while? Thanks for your note, it was invaluable.
-Frank DC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard-<br />
thanks for the explanation, that&#8217;s exactly what is going on in my mixed network as well. I have a Win2K server as well as WinXP Pro clients; which group policies could I enable to allow the XP&#8217;s to continue to access the win98&#8242;s I will still have to run for a while? Thanks for your note, it was invaluable.<br />
-Frank DC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poppaman</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unable-to-access-windows-95-sharing-files-from-windows-xp/#comment-43674</link>
		<dc:creator>poppaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To expand upon what Howard2nd said:

Win9x uses an authentication method called &quot;LANMAN Hash&quot; to authenticate to the network, while Win2K and XP use either NTLM or NTLM2 (I believe by default, but don&#039;t quote me on that...). The LANMAN hash is easily cracked (minutes, on a standard PC).  If you are at ALL concerned about security, I agree that thew Win9x computers be either scrapped, replaced or upgraded....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To expand upon what Howard2nd said:</p>
<p>Win9x uses an authentication method called &#8220;LANMAN Hash&#8221; to authenticate to the network, while Win2K and XP use either NTLM or NTLM2 (I believe by default, but don&#8217;t quote me on that&#8230;). The LANMAN hash is easily cracked (minutes, on a standard PC).  If you are at ALL concerned about security, I agree that thew Win9x computers be either scrapped, replaced or upgraded&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.052 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 309/315 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-22 13:28:37 -->