 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: tape backup and system save</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tape-backup-and-system-save/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tape-backup-and-system-save/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tomliotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tape-backup-and-system-save/#comment-70434</link>
		<dc:creator>tomliotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your question description doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense.

&lt;i&gt;option 21 did nothing after about an hour the system unlocked and I had to IPL&lt;/i&gt;

Was that &quot;Option 21 did nothing after about an hour.&quot;
Followed by &quot;The system unlocked, and I had to IPL.&quot;

Lack of punctuation makes it difficult to be sure. Worse, the words are confusing.

What is meant by &quot;the system unlocked&quot;? What changed to make &quot;unlocked&quot; meaningful? And why did you have to IPL?

What&#039;s really missing is any info from the console joblog that would describe what the backup options thought was happening. There might also have been messages in the QSYSOPR message queue, but the joblog would tell why any messages were sent and what the result was.

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your question description doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense.</p>
<p><i>option 21 did nothing after about an hour the system unlocked and I had to IPL</i></p>
<p>Was that &#8220;Option 21 did nothing after about an hour.&#8221;<br />
Followed by &#8220;The system unlocked, and I had to IPL.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lack of punctuation makes it difficult to be sure. Worse, the words are confusing.</p>
<p>What is meant by &#8220;the system unlocked&#8221;? What changed to make &#8220;unlocked&#8221; meaningful? And why did you have to IPL?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s really missing is any info from the console joblog that would describe what the backup options thought was happening. There might also have been messages in the QSYSOPR message queue, but the joblog would tell why any messages were sent and what the result was.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjjager</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tape-backup-and-system-save/#comment-41065</link>
		<dc:creator>mjjager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also check you messages to verify you are going into restricted state. If you don&#039;t go restricted, the backup will not kick off. Checking cable connections and device status also wouldn&#039;t hurt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also check you messages to verify you are going into restricted state. If you don&#8217;t go restricted, the backup will not kick off. Checking cable connections and device status also wouldn&#8217;t hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjmedina</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tape-backup-and-system-save/#comment-41066</link>
		<dc:creator>cjmedina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have had a similar problem, and the cause was an incorrect tape type. Can you review if the tape is the same as you used before, or maybe the tape is not in good conditions.
The process to make a system save must initialize the tapes by itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a similar problem, and the cause was an incorrect tape type. Can you review if the tape is the same as you used before, or maybe the tape is not in good conditions.<br />
The process to make a system save must initialize the tapes by itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkr0963c</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tape-backup-and-system-save/#comment-41067</link>
		<dc:creator>bkr0963c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[INZTAP command. Press F4 to prompt so that you can fill in the parameters. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INZTAP command. Press F4 to prompt so that you can fill in the parameters. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rayne427</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tape-backup-and-system-save/#comment-41068</link>
		<dc:creator>rayne427</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The initialize tape command can also be called from the command line by typing INZTAP followed by enter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The initialize tape command can also be called from the command line by typing INZTAP followed by enter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.038 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 323/329 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 21:35:50 -->