 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; WatchGuard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/watchguard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Creating a route to allow SEP Live updates through firewall</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/creating-a-route-to-allow-sep-live-updates-through-firewall/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/creating-a-route-to-allow-sep-live-updates-through-firewall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NewnanIT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a Watchguard 550e that doesn&#8217;t allow SEP Live updates to go through. HTTP Proxy is activated, how can I create a route to allow Live update through the firewall? I need to get this done ASAP! This is on a Windows Advanced Server 2003 R2.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Watchguard 550e that doesn&#8217;t allow SEP Live updates to go through. HTTP Proxy is activated, how can I create a route to allow Live update through the firewall? I need to get this done ASAP! This is on a Windows Advanced Server 2003 R2.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/creating-a-route-to-allow-sep-live-updates-through-firewall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What should I do with this Watchguard Firebox 500? I don&#8217;t have the system manager for it&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-should-i-do-with-this-watchguard-firebox-500-i-dont-have-the-system-manager-for-it/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-should-i-do-with-this-watchguard-firebox-500-i-dont-have-the-system-manager-for-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ingram87</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watchguard Firebox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard VPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web security software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was given a Watchguard Firebox 500 today. The model number is F2064N. Apperantly, you need the Firebox System Manager application to manage these devices, which is only available if you have the device actiavated on your watchguard account. Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t have that. Should I destroy it with a chainsaw, or is there some [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was given a Watchguard Firebox 500 today. The model number is F2064N. Apperantly, you need the Firebox System Manager application to manage these devices, which is only available if you have the device actiavated on your watchguard account. Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t have that.</p>
<div>Should I destroy it with a chainsaw, or is there some type of open source software I can load onto this? dd-wrt came to mind at first, however, it doesn&#8217;t support this device.</div>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-should-i-do-with-this-watchguard-firebox-500-i-dont-have-the-system-manager-for-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adding Watchguard static IP for new Exchange server</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-watchguard-static-ip-for-new-exchange-server/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-watchguard-static-ip-for-new-exchange-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sethmorris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2007 administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m having a total brain fart. I set this up before but can&#8217;t remember how I did it. I have one static IP for External interface. I have a second static IP set to my MX address.  .114 is my main external IP. I have .115 as my mail.server.com record.  I tried adding the .115 as [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having a total brain fart. I set this up before but can&#8217;t remember how I did it. I have one static IP for External interface. I have a second static IP set to my MX address. </p>
<div>.114 is my main external IP. I have .115 as my mail.server.com record. </div>
<div>I tried adding the .115 as a secondary IP to the .114 but it won&#8217;t let me. Am I going about this the wrong way?</div>
<div>Single subnet network. </div>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/adding-watchguard-static-ip-for-new-exchange-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>watch guard to cacti</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/watch-guard-to-cacti/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/watch-guard-to-cacti/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cacti Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can i monitor watchguard in cacti]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can i monitor watchguard in cacti</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/watch-guard-to-cacti/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>what is meant by flapping Cisco 2800 router</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-is-meant-by-flapping/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-is-meant-by-flapping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2852</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco 2800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco Catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco Catalyst 3750]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L2 Switches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Router Flapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we have cisco 2800 series router,L3 catalyst 3750 series and watchguard (firewall) and that is connect to L2 switches. But when we connect to router flapping occurs, now we connected to firewall it works fine. please rectify this problem]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have cisco 2800 series router,L3 catalyst 3750 series and watchguard (firewall) and that is connect to L2 switches. But when we connect to router flapping occurs, now we connected to firewall it works fine. please rectify this problem</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-is-meant-by-flapping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OWA in DMZ or not?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/owa-in-dmz-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/owa-in-dmz-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 12:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guysmiley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWA 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi. I run a 2003SP2 Exchange environment with a single Exchange server and a single OWA server in a DMZ. Over the years I&#8217;ve had to open more and more holes between the two networks as I&#8217;ve added features, etc. Someone told me I should bring the OWA server back behind the firewall and only [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I run a 2003SP2 Exchange environment with a single Exchange server and a single OWA server in a DMZ. Over the years I&#8217;ve had to open more and more holes between the two networks as I&#8217;ve added features, etc.  Someone told me I should bring the OWA server back behind the firewall and only open ports 80 and 443 to the outside. I would be usign NAT on my firewall too btw.  Which method is more secure for a smaller environment?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/owa-in-dmz-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watchguard vpn drops vmware connection</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/watchguard-vpn-drops-vmware-connection/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/watchguard-vpn-drops-vmware-connection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watchguard vpn drops vmware connection]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watchguard vpn drops vmware connection</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/watchguard-vpn-drops-vmware-connection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sonicwall vs watchguard</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sonicwall-vs-watchguard/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sonicwall-vs-watchguard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mtupker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA 5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SonicWALL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x6500e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw one other question like this that was posted back in 2006 so I&#8217;m going to ask for more current thoughts. We are at the point where it will cost less to get a new UTM firewall with years subscription than it would to renew the non-UTM license on our sidewinder g2. I was [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw one other question like this that was posted back in 2006 so I&#8217;m going to ask for more current thoughts. We are at the point where it will cost less to get a new UTM firewall with years subscription than it would to renew the non-UTM license on our sidewinder g2. I was wondering what peoples thoughts were about either sonicwall or watchguard firewalls. Specifically the NSA 5000 or x6500e? I&#8217;ve seen a lot of complaints and good things about both.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sonicwall-vs-watchguard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How come my outgoing is blocked. I have a WatchGuard.</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-come-my-outgoing-is-blocked-i-have-a-watchguard/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-come-my-outgoing-is-blocked-i-have-a-watchguard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JENWIT2NS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard Firebox Edge X55e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have all outgoing allowed and still cannot ping outgoing ip address. the log states outgoing blocked. Am i missing something?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have all outgoing allowed and still cannot ping outgoing ip address. the log states outgoing blocked.  Am i missing something?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-come-my-outgoing-is-blocked-i-have-a-watchguard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to add another Internet connection to a firewall</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-add-another-internet-connection-to-a-firewall/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-add-another-internet-connection-to-a-firewall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NetworkingATE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dedicated lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle E-Business Suite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchGuard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a WatchGuard Firewall X15 and use connectivity for our offices. We have taken two 512 kbps Internet connections, because of a price issue from our ISP. We are only using one now. I would like to add another connection to my firewall. But this connection I want use for only HTTP traffic. Why? [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a WatchGuard Firewall X15 and use connectivity for our offices. We have taken two 512 kbps Internet connections, because of a price issue from our ISP. We are only using one now. I would like to add another connection to my firewall. But this connection I want use for only HTTP traffic. Why? Because we are using Oracle E-Business Suite R12. I want to use one dedicated line for ERP. Can you help me?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-add-another-internet-connection-to-a-firewall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/24 queries in 0.027 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 958/1082 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-24 04:40:35 -->