 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; Unified Threat Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/unified-threat-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:09:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Defense in depth and unified threat management appliances</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/defense-in-depth-and-unified-threat-management-appliances/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/defense-in-depth-and-unified-threat-management-appliances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SearchMidmarketSecurityATE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense in Depth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intrusion detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midmarket security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Point of Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Threat Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts tout unified threat management appliances as an ideal antimalware, intrusion prevention and content filtering firewall for midmarket companies. But doesn&#8217;t this counter the long-standing security practice of defense-in-depth? With a one vendor, platform, and management console, aren&#8217;t we talking about a dangerous single point of failure? When is UTM good enough? When should we [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Experts tout unified threat management appliances as an ideal antimalware, intrusion prevention and content filtering firewall for midmarket companies. But doesn&#8217;t this counter the long-standing security practice of defense-in-depth? With a one vendor, platform, and management console, aren&#8217;t we talking about a dangerous single point of failure? </p>
<p>When is UTM good enough? When should we go with standalone devices?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/defense-in-depth-and-unified-threat-management-appliances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to block Google Talk via Fortigate 60?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-block-google-talk-via-fortigate-60/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-block-google-talk-via-fortigate-60/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bkheong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FortiGate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FortiGuard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Threat Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[blocking chatenabled.mail.google.com doesn&#8217;t seem to work anymore. please help!]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blocking chatenabled.mail.google.com doesn&#8217;t seem to work anymore. please help!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-block-google-talk-via-fortigate-60/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UTM (Unified Threat Management)   configuration</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/utm-unified-threat-management-configurtion/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/utm-unified-threat-management-configurtion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>1964</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Unified Threat Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTM and WLAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WLAN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) How To Block all unwanted web sites through the UTM and how to enable the firewall as per customer advice, 2) The 802.11 n WLAN having some problems, throughput is ok but consumer cannot access properly some times,intermittent problem occured during the access time ,(example cannot open the web page and very slow speed [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)  How To Block all unwanted web sites through the UTM and how to enable the firewall as per customer  advice, </p>
<p>2)  The 802.11 n  WLAN having some problems, throughput is ok but consumer cannot access properly some times,intermittent problem occured during the access time ,(example cannot open the web page and very slow speed  during the operation time)</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/utm-unified-threat-management-configurtion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do I have to use proxy with PIX firewall?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-i-have-to-use-proxy-with-pix-firewall/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-i-have-to-use-proxy-with-pix-firewall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Intrnetworking</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco PIX 515E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberoam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberroam proxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Threat Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i have pix 515E firewall and cyber roam device which is using as a proxy.do i have to use proxy with pix firewall]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have pix 515E firewall and cyber roam device which is using as a proxy.do i have to use proxy with pix firewall</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-i-have-to-use-proxy-with-pix-firewall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firewall</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/firewall-2/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/firewall-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Selva1964</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firewall configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Threat Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we have a utm firewall for using a internet processing to our clients,How to block the porn sites i.e is unwanted URLs,and how to configure the same in my utm firewalls.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have a utm firewall for using a internet processing to our clients,How to block the porn sites i.e is unwanted URLs,and how to configure the same in my utm firewalls.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/firewall-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unified Threat Management or Firewall + Web security software</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unified-threat-management-or-firewall-plus-web-security-software/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unified-threat-management-or-firewall-plus-web-security-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>System integration</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Threat Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unified-threat-management-or-firewall-plus-web-security-software/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish to know that, whether deployment of a single UTM box will do a better job then combination of both firewall &#038; web security software in place together?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish to know that, whether deployment of a single UTM box will do a better job then combination of both firewall &#038; web security software in place together?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unified-threat-management-or-firewall-plus-web-security-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/20 queries in 0.024 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 669/743 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-22 05:43:08 -->