 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; UDB for mainframe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/udb-for-mainframe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>BMP scheduling of IMS and DB2 database access.</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/bmp-scheduling-of-ims-and-db2-database-access/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/bmp-scheduling-of-ims-and-db2-database-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 13:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ElJaymid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DB2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDB for mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[z/OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Application developers have nearly completed a conversion from IMS to DB2. They have used BMP to leave their test subsystems available to online tranactions. One day BMP users of BMP failed with U3042. This only occured for BMP users testing with IMS &#038; DB2 databases. I am investigating the issue, without much IMS support experience. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Application developers have nearly completed a conversion from IMS to DB2.  They have used BMP to leave their test subsystems available to online tranactions.  One day BMP users of BMP failed with U3042.  This only occured for BMP users testing with IMS &#038; DB2 databases.  I am investigating the issue, without much IMS support experience.  In addition, IMS is backleveled.  (a) I checked the connection between IMS and DB2 (DIS STATUS; DIS ACTIVE; DIS CCTL) and the connection looks like it is available.  Since the BMP/IMS/DB2</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/bmp-scheduling-of-ims-and-db2-database-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM DB2 load restart</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ibm-db2-load-restart/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ibm-db2-load-restart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sumithar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DB2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDB for mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[z/OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am faced with a situation where my SYSREC file for a LOAD could potentially have duplicates. If there are dupes then I have a step that follows that analyses the SYSDISC file,so my DISCARDS is set to 0. If for whatever reason the utility blows up (ran out of space, whatever) and I choose [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am faced with a situation where my SYSREC file for a LOAD could potentially have duplicates.  If there are dupes then I have a step that follows that analyses the SYSDISC file,so my DISCARDS is set to 0.</p>
<p>If for whatever reason the utility blows up (ran out of space, whatever) and I choose to RESTART it I want it to skip processing those records in the SYSREC that were already inserted successfully.  </p>
<p>But in my testing I am finding that the utility clutters up my SYSDISC with the records that were inserted before the abend (which I don&#8217;t want to process) in addition to the ones caused by there being duplicates to begin with (which i do want to process).</p>
<p>Is there a way to force the utility to RESTART in such a way that it will start reading teh SYSREC only from the last commit?  I tried UTILID=&#8217;RESTART(CURRENT)&#8217;-  no good.</p>
<p>I have RESUME YES, SHRLEVEL CHANGE.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for your time</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ibm-db2-load-restart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scalar functions in GROUP BY</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/scalar-functions-in-group-by/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/scalar-functions-in-group-by/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sumithar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DB2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDB for mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[z/OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a reason why I cannot use a SCALAR function in a Group BY clause? I have a table with a column that is of type timestamp. I want to get a count of all dates for which there are multiple rows. So I devise a query of the sort SELECT COUNT(*), DAYS(TMSTP_COL) FROM [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a reason why I cannot use a SCALAR function in a Group BY clause?<br />
I have a table with a column that is of type timestamp.  I want to get a count of all dates for which there are multiple rows.  So I devise a query of the sort</p>
<p>SELECT COUNT(*), DAYS(TMSTP_COL)<br />
FROM MYTAB A<br />
GROUP BY DAYS(TMSTP_COL)<br />
HAVING COUNT(*) &gt; 1<br />
ORDER BY COUNT(*) DESC</p>
<p>I get an error<br />
DSNT408I SQLCODE = -104, ERROR:  ILLEGAL SYMBOL &#8220;(&#8220;.</p>
<p>I know it is complaining about the DAYS function since the moment I remove it, the error goes away</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/scalar-functions-in-group-by/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle In Linux</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/oracle-in-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/oracle-in-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 01:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Samachar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD PC hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data warehousing/Business intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Management Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DB2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installation/Upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating system platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle 8i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle 9i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance/Tuning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PostgreSQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Anywhere Studio/M-Business Anywhere/Avantgo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard One Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDB for mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unisys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[z/OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can I able to get and work with Oracle in Linux platform. I am using RedHat Linux 9.0.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I able to get and work with Oracle in Linux platform. I am using RedHat Linux 9.0.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/oracle-in-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DB2 Automated Utilities &#8211; Vendor selection</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/db2-automated-utilities-vendor-selection/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/db2-automated-utilities-vendor-selection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 11:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galvtx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DB2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/390/z/OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDB for mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[z/OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We use the IBM utilities suite and our own in-house utilities automation for DB2 v7. Our automated utilities is now draining us with heavy maintenance and since V7, there are still a few holes that could cause us some serious damage if not fixed in the near future. However, with V8, we would definitely have [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use the IBM utilities suite and our own in-house utilities automation for DB2 v7.</p>
<p>Our automated utilities is now draining us with heavy maintenance and since V7, there are still a few holes that could cause us some serious damage if not fixed in the near future.  However, with V8, we would definitely have problems and we have justified the evaluation of an Automated Utility toolset.  This would need to be in place before we go to V8.</p>
<p>I am of the opinion that we should have one suite for the purpose of DB2 maintenance, backup and recovery, thinking that multiple vendor support here would become a &#8216;mare.</p>
<p>We are also well vested in IBM&#8217;s utilities across development staff who maintain their own data in the development subsystems.</p>
<p>Has anyone done this excercise &#8211; if so, which product did you select? and a any additional comments would be great.<br />
thank you.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/db2-automated-utilities-vendor-selection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Encryption in the Database</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/encryption-in-the-database/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/encryption-in-the-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 14:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dw49999</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDB for mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[z/OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has anyone encrypted data in their Oracle/DB2/SQLServer databases? Can you share you experiences?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone encrypted data in their Oracle/DB2/SQLServer databases?  Can you share you experiences?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/encryption-in-the-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DB2 Z/os IRLMWT parm</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/db2-zos-irlmwt-parm/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/db2-zos-irlmwt-parm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 13:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RichardG12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/390/z/OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDB for mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[z/OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are considering lowering the lockwait time from the two minute default to 60 seconds and then possibly even lower. What do you have it set to today? Have you had any experience with having it set well below one minute?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are considering lowering the lockwait time from the two minute default to 60 seconds and then possibly even lower.  What do you have it set to today?  Have you had any experience with having it set well below one minute?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/db2-zos-irlmwt-parm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.038 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 809/838 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-25 07:57:04 -->