 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; Storage servers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/storage-servers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>How to merge 2 disks on 1 hard drive to create a large storage server for archived data? (Poweredge 2800 and Windows Server 2003)</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-merge-2-disks-on-1-hard-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-merge-2-disks-on-1-hard-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ODSTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell PowerEdge 2800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage configuration management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an old Dell PowerEdge server that I want to convert to a large data storage server &#8211; nothing on it but archived data.  The hard drive has been formatted to have about 70G on the C drive and about 130G on a different drive.  BUT both drives are located on the same hard [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an old Dell PowerEdge server that I want to convert to a large data storage server &#8211; nothing on it but archived data.  The hard drive has been formatted to have about 70G on the C drive and about 130G on a different drive.  BUT both drives are located on the same hard drive.  How can I get all the space to show up on one drive?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-merge-2-disks-on-1-hard-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>storage charge back</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/storage-charge-back/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/storage-charge-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blue55bl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage arrays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Chargeback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage servers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has anyone found a package for storage charge back that actually works at most levels:array, server, deptment, and application.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone found a package for storage charge back that actually works at most levels:array, server, deptment, and application.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/storage-charge-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for Antivirus for Win Storage 2003 x64 server</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/looking-for-antivirus-for-win-storage-2003-x64-server/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/looking-for-antivirus-for-win-storage-2003-x64-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oksana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Systems Management Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secure Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage products and equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, We are looking for an antivirus software that proven to work well with windows storage 2003 x64 server. Our current product works just fine on all other 2003 servers, but it brings down this one from time to time. Thanks, Oksana]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
We are looking for an antivirus software that proven to work well with windows storage 2003 x64 server.<br />
Our current product works just fine on all other 2003 servers, but it brings down this one from time to time.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Oksana</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/looking-for-antivirus-for-win-storage-2003-x64-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Type of storage/backup solution</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/type-of-storagebackup-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/type-of-storagebackup-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DWillms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Backup & recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage products and equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey everyone, I just started with a medium sized business doing IT work, and they have asked me to research types of backup solutions. At this point we are running a server that holds about 350 GB of data, and we have 2 remote offsite locations which they would also like to back up as [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everyone,<br />
I just started with a medium sized business doing IT work, and they have asked me to research types of backup solutions. At this point we are running a server that holds about 350 GB of data, and we have 2 remote offsite locations which they would also like to back up as well. The total approximate size would be around 500GB, but they&#8217;d like to start off with 1TB and have the option for expandability as well. Right now they are using tape backups, and I believe would like to get rid of that somehow, but the data would also have to be stored offsite as well somewhere, in case of some sort of disaster at the main office. In the small bit of research I&#8217;ve done, I think for this size of storage would a NAS device not be the best option, running Windows Storage Server 2003 or similar, and then maybe the possibility of a second NAS running offsite or at one of the other locations. If you ran both of these NAS&#8217;s with RAID 1 or RAID 5, that would give you multiple data redundancy, and also offsite storage, and from the prices I&#8217;ve been able to find, it seems like that would be much cheaper than a similar SAN solution. If the company did go with something like a SAN device, they would most likely go with iSCSI, not Fiber Channel, just for the reduced cost. Of course a third option would be something like an automated tape loader, but if they want to get away from tape storage, that may not be the best option. Also, what kind of companies provide offsite storage services such as this? What would services like that cost?</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for your help!</p>
<p>Edit: Just a little more info, we&#8217;re not moving to Vista any time soon, moving completely away from tape isn&#8217;t a necessity, so something like a D2D2T solution could work as well. Is this size of backup worth going to a SAN or not? I don&#8217;t see the reason if they will be using iSCSI anyways.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/type-of-storagebackup-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backup Exec 9.1 to WIndows Storage 2003</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/backup-exec-91-to-windows-storage-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/backup-exec-91-to-windows-storage-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sdr0715</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage products and equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veritas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just gotten a Dell NAS running Windows Storage 2003 64&#8230;I am trying to load a Backup Exec v9.1 remote server agent on it but unable to get it installed. Can someone help me with this&#8230;Thanks Santiago]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just gotten a Dell NAS running Windows Storage 2003 64&#8230;I am trying to load a Backup Exec v9.1 remote server agent on it but unable to get it installed.  Can someone help me with this&#8230;Thanks</p>
<p>Santiago</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/backup-exec-91-to-windows-storage-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Storage 2003 Server</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-storage-2003-server/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-storage-2003-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sdr0715</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAS appliances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good morning All, I need help, I am considering about getting a Dell NAS appliance running Windows Storage 2003 Server. I am wondering if anyone can tell me or point me, where I can find info about this like admin, printer sharing, etc. The Windows Storage site is not much help. Also, if someone knows [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning All,<br />
I need help, I am considering about getting a Dell NAS appliance running Windows Storage 2003 Server.  I am wondering if anyone can tell me or point me, where I can find info about this like admin, printer sharing, etc.  The Windows Storage site is not much help.  Also, if someone knows the difference between the version (Standard, Workgroup and Enterprise)</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
SD</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/windows-storage-2003-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMC Clariion CX700 Problems &#8211; Data Sector Invalidated</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/emc-clariion-cx700-problems-data-sector-invalidated/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/emc-clariion-cx700-problems-data-sector-invalidated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UniCal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arrays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLARiiON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clariion CX700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fibre channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage products and equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage servers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, I have two EMC Clariion CX700&#8242;s (which, for convenience we call CX700-1 and CX700-2) and one recently added CX3-40 in my SAN environment using fiber-switch fabric. Over the weekend, I experienced a hardware failure on SPA on CX700-1. After having it replaced by my vendor&#8217;s technician and getting the SP to reboot successfully, all [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I have two EMC Clariion CX700&#8242;s (which, for convenience we call CX700-1 and CX700-2) and one recently added CX3-40 in my SAN environment using fiber-switch fabric. Over the weekend, I experienced a hardware failure on SPA on CX700-1. After having it replaced by my vendor&#8217;s technician and getting the SP to reboot successfully, all was fine until 2 hours later when I got another unwelcomed alert, this time it was about an uncorrectable sector (Data Sector Invalidated):</p>
<p>&#8220;Event Number 840<br />
Severity Warning Host CX700-1_SPA<br />
Storage Array APMxx SPA Device Bus 1 Enclosure 3 Disk 3<br />
Description Data Sector Invalidated&#8221;</p>
<p>Since then, I&#8217;ve been getting the same &#8220;Data Sector Invalidated &#8211; Bus 1 Enclosure 3 Disk 3&#8243; error at least once every day. The only solution to this as I gathered from my vendor is to unbind and then rebind the LUNs on this disk as there is a good chance some of my data within the LUNs have been corrupted &#8212; hence the uncorrectable sector error. <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Has anyone else have this experience before? Is this a common occurrence from the Clariion CX-series product? As of now, I am still uncertain how the sector became uncorrectable and what lead/caused the data corruption.</p>
<p>Unrelated to this, I am also having performance issues (in particular, forced flushing) every other week. As a long-term solution, I am getting quite concerned about my SAN environment. If possible, can anyone share some of their experiences with the EMC Clariion CX-series line?</p>
<p>Any input is greatly appreciated!<br />
Thank you.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/emc-clariion-cx700-problems-data-sector-invalidated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equallogic</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/equallogic/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/equallogic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nozmeister0</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arrays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EqualLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage servers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, Just looking for people&#8217;s experiences of using Equallogic SAN attached storage. Specifically - Performance - Interoperability - Cost - Competition - Management software Thanks in advance Noz]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Just looking for people&#8217;s experiences of using Equallogic SAN attached storage. </p>
<p>Specifically<br />
- Performance<br />
- Interoperability<br />
- Cost<br />
- Competition<br />
- Management software</p>
<p>Thanks in advance<br />
Noz</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/equallogic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increasing server performance</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/increasing-server-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/increasing-server-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dimchik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NTFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Help reviving servers. Configuration current: 8 300GB disks in Raid 5 10000RPM Each. Total 2TB (70%Full) with an average of 68kb files tottal of 24 million files. The curent read rate is at 8MB/Sec on NTFS windows 2003 Partition. Any suggestions on increasing performance on current configuration. P.S. We are running diskkeeper as difrag utility.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help reviving servers.<br />
Configuration current:<br />
8 300GB disks in Raid 5 10000RPM Each.<br />
Total 2TB (70%Full) with an average of 68kb files tottal of 24 million files. The curent read rate is at 8MB/Sec on NTFS windows 2003 Partition. Any suggestions on increasing performance on current configuration.<br />
P.S. We are running diskkeeper as difrag utility.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/increasing-server-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>802.11 vs 802.16</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/80211-vs-80216/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/80211-vs-80216/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cablegeeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arrays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billing and customer care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billing Support Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frame Relay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network applications management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network management software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI & cost justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Services Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a small co. with a point to point wireless grid. I handle off site monitoring of gas nad oil flow. I have been overlaping my grid with new locations, and more to come. So I have been looking into new wireless Sys. I have made the choice to use All-In-One?360 Multi-Band/Multi-Mode Antenna WiMAX [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a small co. with a point to point wireless grid. I handle off site monitoring of gas nad oil flow. I have been overlaping my grid with new locations, and more to come. So I have been looking into new wireless Sys. I have made the choice to use All-In-One?360 Multi-Band/Multi-Mode Antenna WiMAX Ready. It will take a few to replace my hole grid. Now with my new antennas in place I have full cover of about 30 miles. Trying to stay with new techknowledge I will be useing 802.11 or 801.16. This will all so give me a chance to start up a WISP. So my question is&#8230;What do I need to start up? and what tpye should I use?  If any could help me with this first step it would help me get started Faster.<br />
Thank You,<br />
Brent</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/80211-vs-80216/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/30 queries in 0.037 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 1094/1259 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-25 08:31:20 -->