<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; SQL Server data warehousing/business intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/sql-server-data-warehousingbusiness-intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:45:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>SSRS Report switch for Operational DB to DWH</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ssrs-report-switch-for-opperational-db-to-dwh/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ssrs-report-switch-for-opperational-db-to-dwh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>An279505</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL Server data warehousing/business intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server Reporting Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server Reporting Services 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSRS 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We currently are running a large report off of the operational DB but in turn used this report to create a DWH in order to get this report to run faster. Before we used a stored procedure with many smaller queries that summed our numbers. Since we have the DWH that stores all this needed [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We currently are running a large report off of the operational DB but in turn used this report to create a DWH in order to get this report to run faster. Before we used a stored procedure with many smaller queries that summed our numbers. Since we have the DWH that stores all this needed data in one or two fact tables (the operational DB is highly normalized) is it better in terms of performance to create one sql statement that pulls these flags on each row (i.e. Gender &#8211; F, M, NULL) and then do a sum on the report side by using group by&#8217;s or is it a better idea to sum all the numbers in the SQL statement and just throw these summed amounts into individual text boxes?<br/><br/> This is the first Data Warehouse I have ever created or even seen and I am just trying to figure out the capability of this with the use of SSRS. If you need any more specifics or have further questions I can give further detail. Thanks so much!<br/><br/></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ssrs-report-switch-for-opperational-db-to-dwh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sage Mas 500 setting up Microsoft Project link.</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sage-mas-500-setting-up-microsoft-project-link/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sage-mas-500-setting-up-microsoft-project-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl Gechlik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MAS 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sage Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server data warehousing/business intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am running Sage M500 &#8211; I need to be able to link my project files to my M500/SQL data and vice versa. I see lots of information on functionality but only consultants that want to set it up! HELP Me do this for free and save the day!]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am running Sage M500 &#8211; I need to be able to link my project files to my M500/SQL data and vice versa. I see lots of information on functionality but only consultants that want to set it up!</p>
<p>HELP Me do this for free and save the day!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sage-mas-500-setting-up-microsoft-project-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When designing a data warehouse in SQL Server what is the best setting for the varchar data type?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/when-designing-a-data-warehouse-in-sql-server-what-is-the-best-setting-for-the-varchar-data-type/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/when-designing-a-data-warehouse-in-sql-server-what-is-the-best-setting-for-the-varchar-data-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SQL Server Ask the Experts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL Server data warehousing/business intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am designing a data warehouse database to be implemented in SQL Server. There are a number of variable length character fields for which I intend to use the varchar field type. On previous data warehouse implementations in Oracle, I frequently set the length for the varchar fields higher than the current data length. I [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am designing a data warehouse database to be implemented in SQL Server. There are a number of variable length character fields for which I intend to use the varchar field type. On previous data warehouse implementations in Oracle, I frequently set the length for the varchar fields higher than the current data length. I did this so that if the source changes to a longer field in the future, it will not be necessary to update the database. Is there any reason not to do this for a SQL Server database? One example would be, if the actual data field is now up to 10 characters, but I want to make the field type varchar (25) in case the source changes to a larger field in the future.  Will this have any negative performance implications?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/when-designing-a-data-warehouse-in-sql-server-what-is-the-best-setting-for-the-varchar-data-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which is more advanced in an Excel/Microsoft SQL Server Analysis Services environment, MDX or UDM?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/which-is-more-advanced-in-an-excelmicrosoft-sql-server-analysis-services-environment-mdx-or-udm/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/which-is-more-advanced-in-an-excelmicrosoft-sql-server-analysis-services-environment-mdx-or-udm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SQL Server Ask the Experts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL Server Analysis Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server data warehousing/business intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSAS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is more advanced in an Excel/Microsoft SQL Server Analysis Services environment, MDX or UDM?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is more advanced in an Excel/Microsoft SQL Server Analysis Services environment, MDX or UDM?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/which-is-more-advanced-in-an-excelmicrosoft-sql-server-analysis-services-environment-mdx-or-udm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/16 queries in 0.021 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 513/553 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-19 23:54:40 -->