 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; QRY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/qry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>RTVQMQRY    Why does it change the last used date of the *qrydfn obj?  Anyway to prevent this update?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/rtvqmqry-why-does-it-change-the-last-used-date-of-the-qrydfn-obj-anyway-to-prevent-this-update/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/rtvqmqry-why-does-it-change-the-last-used-date-of-the-qrydfn-obj-anyway-to-prevent-this-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Modiyooch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QRY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RTVQMQRY    Why does it change the last used date of the *qrydfn obj?  Anyway to prevent  this update? ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RTVQMQRY    Why does it change the last used date of the *qrydfn obj?  Anyway to prevent  this update? </p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/rtvqmqry-why-does-it-change-the-last-used-date-of-the-qrydfn-obj-anyway-to-prevent-this-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access paths no longer valid</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/access-paths-no-longer-valid/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/access-paths-no-longer-valid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Modiyooch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS/400 Access Paths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSeries performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QRY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, the plot thickens. I&#8217;m trying to identify and rebuild LFs that after an abnormal shutdown and normal ipl, are no longer being selected for SQL and QRY. These files are not damaged, but program response has taken a major hit due to these views not being selected. After researdhing one known file before and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, the plot thickens.  I&#8217;m trying to identify and rebuild LFs that after an abnormal shutdown and normal ipl, are no longer being selected for SQL and QRY.  These files are not damaged, but program response has taken a major hit due to these views not being selected.  </p>
<p>After researdhing one known file before and after rebuilding, the discrepancies that I find are that<br />
1.  access path valid field was set to &#8220;N&#8221;     (MBINDX field is dspfd)<br />
2.  Index entry Count was = 0<br />
3.  Index size was  miniscule</p>
<p>These LFs have gone from heavy daily usage to *none.  Recompiling the LF corrects the problem.</p>
<p>How and why does the MBINDX field get set to &#8220;N&#8221;?  What&#8217;s considered a valid access path?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/access-paths-no-longer-valid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AS400 Qry &#8211; Is there a way to trick qry into treating blanks as null?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-qry-is-there-a-way-to-trick-qry-into-treating-blanks-as-null/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-qry-is-there-a-way-to-trick-qry-into-treating-blanks-as-null/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS/400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QRY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Query]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The data I need to sort on is in either field A or B depending on the transaction type. It could be accomplished by using the &#8220;value&#8221; expression if qry would consider a blank field as null. Any ideas?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The data I need to sort on is in either field A or B depending on the transaction type.  It could be accomplished by using the &#8220;value&#8221; expression if qry would consider a blank field as null. Any ideas?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/as400-qry-is-there-a-way-to-trick-qry-into-treating-blanks-as-null/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/16 queries in 0.018 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 448/490 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 20:00:27 -->