 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; program efficiency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/program-efficiency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:55:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>How to find PC CPU utilization and programming efficiency on Windows XP?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-find-pc-cpu-utilization-and-programming-efficiency-on-windows-xp/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-find-pc-cpu-utilization-and-programming-efficiency-on-windows-xp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SbElectric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPU Utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elapsed or execution time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[program efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite a while back I posted a puzzle: Find a number that when divided by 10, remainder is 9; divided by 9 remainder is 8, etc. A number of people responded with correct answer. I was pleasantly surprised to come across a post by kccrosser suggesting how the logic of the program can be modified [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a while back I posted a puzzle:  Find a number that when divided by 10, remainder is 9; divided by 9 remainder is 8, etc.  A number of people responded with correct answer.  I was pleasantly surprised to come across a post by kccrosser suggesting how the logic of the program can be modified to gain efficiency.   He shed light on some important observations and suggestions. Following on his observation my question is: How to find efficiency on running programs on stand-alone Desktop computers?  (For simplicity let us ignore networked).   Is there a way I can find the CPU utilization , elapsed time, or some other criteria to see how efficiently one program (Excel, access, vb)is running?<br />
In IBM mainframe, we usually look into CPU time, Disk I/o, elapsed time, etc (this is generally printed at the end of a job).<br />
Any suggestions or ideas?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-to-find-pc-cpu-utilization-and-programming-efficiency-on-windows-xp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/12 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 320/330 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-21 07:27:03 -->