 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; NAC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/networking/nac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Using Network Access Control to limit Internet access on a specific few machines</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/using-network-access-control-to-limit-internet-access-on-a-specific-few-machines/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/using-network-access-control-to-limit-internet-access-on-a-specific-few-machines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl Gechlik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Access Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2 Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can we use Windows 2008’s Network Access Control to limit intern’s computers from getting to the Internet? Where is this feature setup and do we need a client on the computers or does AD take care of this?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How<br />
     can we use Windows 2008’s Network Access Control to limit intern’s<br />
     computers from getting to the Internet? Where is this feature setup and do<br />
     we need a client on the computers or does AD take care of this?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/using-network-access-control-to-limit-internet-access-on-a-specific-few-machines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you explain network access control in Windows Server 2008 R2 and how to set it up?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/can-you-explain-network-access-control-and-how-to-set-it-up/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/can-you-explain-network-access-control-and-how-to-set-it-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl Gechlik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Access Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2 Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What exactly is Network Access Control in Windows 2008 R2? How can we implement it?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly is Network Access Control in Windows 2008 R2? How can we implement it?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/can-you-explain-network-access-control-and-how-to-set-it-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Network Access Control</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cisco-nac/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cisco-nac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RGPrakash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Access Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Security Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security in 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, I would like to know the facts about the NAC (implementation, Deployment and trouble shooting guides) .some questions rasing in my mind. Appreciating your help.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I would like to know the facts about the NAC (implementation, Deployment and trouble shooting guides) .some questions rasing in my mind. Appreciating your help.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cisco-nac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAC and Wireless Controllers</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-and-wireless-controllers/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-and-wireless-controllers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tankman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco Wireless LAN Controller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless LAN controller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a need to setup conference rooms that will be used by both corporate and foreign or guest devices. I would like to use wired and wireless for flexibility and video conferencing. NAC seems like a no brainer but am curious if I should look into a Wireless Lan Contoller device of some sort [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a need to setup conference rooms that will be used by both corporate and foreign or guest devices.  I would like to use wired and wireless for flexibility and video conferencing.  NAC seems like a no brainer but am curious if I should look into a Wireless Lan Contoller device of some sort too?  Wouldn&#8217;t a NAC do the same thing as what a WLC would do?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-and-wireless-controllers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAC Recommendations</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-recommendations/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-recommendations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Insanediego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Acess Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the best NAC?  I am doing market research on NAC and would like to hear what you like/dislike about the products in the market.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the best NAC?  I am doing market research on NAC and would like to hear what you like/dislike about the products in the market.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-recommendations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>802.1X</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/8021x/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/8021x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mac1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[802.1x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the difference between NAC and 802.1x?  Can you implement 802.1x without NAC?  My understanding is you could implement a NAC solution not utilizing 802.1x but not the other way around.    Thanks Rick McGee ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the difference between NAC and 802.1x?  Can you implement 802.1x without NAC?  My understanding is you could implement a NAC solution not utilizing 802.1x but not the other way around. <br/><br/>  <br/><br/> Thanks<br/><br/> Rick McGee <br/><br/></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/8021x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAC and Static IP addresses</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-and-static-ip-addresses/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-and-static-ip-addresses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Serviceguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco Routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static IP Configuration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you use a static IP network addressing scheme (no dhcp) with a NAC solution?  It was my understanding that NAC works best with DHCP Is that true?  Anyone today using a static IP network with DHCP?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you use a static IP network addressing scheme (no dhcp) with a NAC solution?  It was my understanding that NAC works best with DHCP<br/><br/> Is that true?  Anyone today using a static IP network with DHCP?<br/><br/></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-and-static-ip-addresses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAC recommendation</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-recommendation/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-recommendation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rishard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Access control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterasys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterasys Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Access Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am doing NAC research for my company to see what would be the best solution to implement it. We having serious problems with managed and unmanaged users coming onto the network which spread alot of viruses, thats why we need control who is coming onto the network.To give you some background info this is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am doing NAC research for my company to see what would be the best solution to implement it. We having serious problems with managed and unmanaged users coming onto the network which spread alot of viruses, thats why we need control who is coming onto the network.To give you some background info this is what the landscape looks like.</p>
<p>There is a total of about 12000 users in our company<br />
We have an Enterasys backbone not all of the switches are 802.1X compliant i would say 70% is.<br />
We running Microsft environment, the hosts are running Vista and XP , servers are 2003 and a few 2008. We will be migrating to 2008 over the next 18 months. We have System Center Config manager doing our patches.We just implemented microsoft PKI.<br />
Symantec SEP11 is our AV software. </p>
<p>What i was task to do is see if we can utilise our existing investment in implementing NAC and the cost associated to that and what a complete new solution other that what we have would cost to implement.</p>
<p>My dilemma is knowing what all the vendors offerings are what would be the best solution for us to go with?. Is it out-of-band or in-line or both ? There is so many many things to consider and just feel overwhelmed at the moment with all the options.</p>
<p>If anyone can assist in this decision i would really be gratefull.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nac-recommendation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Network access control security problem</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/network-access-control-security-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/network-access-control-security-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gaf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Access Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Permissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi everybody, I am not a security expert nor an IT specialist but having a network of 7 terminals, some users are limited account others are administrators, some having XP OS others 98 and 2000.All the 6 terminals has to log on using a user name and a password when trying to click on any [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everybody,</p>
<p>I am not a security expert nor an IT specialist but having a network of 7 terminals, some users are limited account others are administrators, some having XP OS others 98 and 2000.All the 6 terminals has to log on using a user name and a password when trying to click on any of  the pc names in the workgroup network icons, except one  terminal wich has win 98 OS is accessing directly the hard drive of a certain computer without even the necessity to log on with a user name and a password, i tried to eliminate any user name from the hard drive security tab in that accessed computer but the problem still, all other 6 computers need to log on with user and password . Can any one provide a step by step guide please to solve this matter and oblige the user of that computer to log on with a user name and a password each time he clicks the icon ?</p>
<p>i appreciate very much your help .Thank you .</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/network-access-control-security-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/22 queries in 0.029 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 880/966 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-23 02:39:39 -->