 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; Network performance management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/network-performance-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>CIFS vs NETBIOS &amp; network performance</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cifs-vs-netbios-network-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cifs-vs-netbios-network-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Labnuke99</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetBIOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network performance management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Testing file open performance across a WAN vs LAN. I open a 1MB .rtf file. When opening on the LAN, the traffic is on port 445 (CIFS). When opening the same file from the same server across the WAN, the traffic is on port 139 (NETBIOS). My question for all of you protocol gurus: Is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing file open performance across a WAN vs LAN. I open a 1MB .rtf file. When opening on the LAN, the traffic is on port 445 (CIFS). When opening the same file from the same server across the WAN, the traffic is on port 139 (NETBIOS).</p>
<p>My question for all of you protocol gurus:<br />
Is there really any difference in the traffic when using a different port to do the same activity? If so, what are those differences &#038; how does it contribute to end-user experience?</p>
<p>Some other information you might be interested in:</p>
<p>Number of packets<br />
LAN – 1,544<br />
WAN – 1,864<br />
Size of data packets<br />
LAN – 1,474 bytes<br />
WAN – 1,354 bytes<br />
Time to open (first packet to last packet)<br />
LAN – 3 secs<br />
WAN – 19 secs</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cifs-vs-netbios-network-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>identifying cause of unexplained network traffic</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/identifying-cause-of-unexplained-network-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/identifying-cause-of-unexplained-network-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frugal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ICMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network performance management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network performance monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question Edited by MTidmarsh]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Question Edited by MTidmarsh]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/identifying-cause-of-unexplained-network-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How improve System Speed?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-improve-system-speed/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-improve-system-speed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Parashu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Network performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network performance management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System maintainance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our organisation,we have a 120 clients pc &#038; one Domain Server .In this environment most of the computers are so slow ,is not cause RAM because we already have 1gb RAM. In this condition we how improove our systems please give me replay. regards, Parashu]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our organisation,we have a 120 clients pc &#038; one Domain Server .In this environment most of the computers are so slow ,is not cause RAM because we already have 1gb RAM. In this condition we how improove our systems please give me replay.<br/><br/> regards,<br/><br/> Parashu<br/><br/></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/how-improve-system-speed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.029 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 461/500 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-23 03:06:30 -->