 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; Linux encryption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/linux-encryption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Which Linux client is best for full encryption on a limited platform?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/which-linux-client-is-best-for-full-encryption-on-a-limited-platform/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/which-linux-client-is-best-for-full-encryption-on-a-limited-platform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BrentSheets</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atom processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux Distributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I realize &#8220;full encryption&#8221; might be interpreted in different ways – and my intention is not to start a Linux flame war – but I was hoping to hear some opinions on which Linux clients perform best on limited platforms with full-time data encryption. Two questions: 1) If 256-bit encryption of all data, including [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I realize &#8220;full encryption&#8221; might be interpreted in different ways – and my intention is not to start a Linux flame war – but I was hoping to hear some opinions on which Linux clients perform best on limited platforms with full-time data encryption.</p>
<p><b>Two questions:</b></p>
<p><b>1)</b> If 256-bit encryption of all data, including temporary data, were a prime concern – which Linux distros would be on your short list? I don&#8217;t wish to be stuck with a boutique Linux with a short life – but I&#8217;d be willing to investigate less popular distros, if the security features had merit.</p>
<p><b>2)</b> Would a limited platform such as a Atom Netbook be able to perform reasonably well with this level of encryption? Yeah, I know, &#8220;reasonably well&#8221; is another relative term. Obviously, no heavy lifting with the Netbook but I do wish everything encrypted. Just looking for thoughts and opinions. Thanks!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a long-time Mac/PC user and have never (gasp! choke!) never gone down Linux Lane. So maybe I&#8217;m going about this all wrong. Maybe any popular Linux would do and there is some wonderful encryption tool that fits the bill instead? The main thing is a Netbook with total encryption that is not bogged down beyond use. Thanks.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/which-linux-client-is-best-for-full-encryption-on-a-limited-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/12 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 328/339 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 00:24:27 -->