 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; iSCSI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/iscsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Unable to delete ISCSI Target in Red Hat</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unable-to-delete-iscsi-target-in-red-hat/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unable-to-delete-iscsi-target-in-red-hat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bluesky1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RedHat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unable-to-delete-iscsi-target-in-red-hat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Answer by bluesky1]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[New Answer by bluesky1]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/unable-to-delete-iscsi-target-in-red-hat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advice required on building career in Storage Area Network</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/advice-required-on-build-career-in-storage-area-network/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/advice-required-on-build-career-in-storage-area-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 04:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCoE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Area Network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/advice-required-on-build-career-in-storage-area-network/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Answer by Harisheldon]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[New Answer by Harisheldon]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/advice-required-on-build-career-in-storage-area-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Infiniband storage network using SRP</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/infiniband-storage-network-using-srp/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/infiniband-storage-network-using-srp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris74</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hypervisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infiniband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question Edited by Serena3]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Question Edited by Serena3]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/infiniband-storage-network-using-srp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iSCSI Initiator errors after trying to set up IPsec.</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/broke-my-iscsi-initiator/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/broke-my-iscsi-initiator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cyanexavior</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IPsec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI Initiator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an effort to set up some sort of security on the IP traffic between the systems using iSCSI I attempted to implement IPsec. In doing so the Windows iSCSI initiators were no longer able to communicate with the targets. So after removing the settings in the local security policy most of the systems were [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to set up some sort of security on the IP traffic between the systems using iSCSI I attempted to implement IPsec.  In doing so the Windows iSCSI initiators were no longer able to communicate with the targets.  So after removing the settings in the local security policy most of the systems were back up and could see the vhds with the exception of one.  This system can actually see the targets but whenever I try and create a session it gives me the error &#8220;The Target name is not found or is marked hidden from login&#8221;.  An interesting note is that when I try and discover the host system through a specific portal it won&#8217;t show the targets, only when I set my iSNS server (which is the same machine).  My suspicion is that the configuration settings from when I tried to set it up to use IPSec is still in there and flushing that out would do the trick.  I would even be fine with reinstalling the initiator software if I could figure out how to uninstall it.  (This system is using Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise).  Jeez I&#8217;m just getting scatterbrained now, any ideas?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/broke-my-iscsi-initiator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VM ESX using sata drives</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vm-esx-using-sata-drives/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vm-esx-using-sata-drives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stantheman751</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SATA Drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware ESX Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can I install VMware&#8217;s ESX server on a system using sata drives or will I  have to have scsi drives instead. Thanks,  Stan]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I install VMware&#8217;s ESX server on a system using sata drives or will I  have to have scsi drives instead.</p>
<div></div>
<div>Thanks, </div>
<div>Stan</div>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/vm-esx-using-sata-drives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has anyone used StarWind iSCSI for production network? What about its reliability and performance?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/has-anyone-used-starwind-iscsi-for-production-network-what-about-its-reliability-and-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/has-anyone-used-starwind-iscsi-for-production-network-what-about-its-reliability-and-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ITKE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin provisioning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[StarWind claims to turn any standard server into a fault-tolerant, fail-safe Windows iSCSI target SAN. Compared to EMC and Netapp products, where does it stand in term of performance &#038; reliability (e.g. assuming new &#038; stable server)? Has anyone deployed it on production? What kind of hardware do you use/recommend (e.g. Dell R410 etc)? Can [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StarWind claims to turn any standard server into a fault-tolerant, fail-safe Windows iSCSI target SAN. Compared to EMC and Netapp products, where does it stand in term of performance &#038; reliability (e.g. assuming new &#038; stable server)? Has anyone deployed it on production? What kind of hardware do you use/recommend (e.g. Dell R410 etc)? Can StarWind support advanced features like deduplication &#038; thin replication?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/has-anyone-used-starwind-iscsi-for-production-network-what-about-its-reliability-and-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the benefits tO FC and iSCSI?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-are-the-benefits-to-fc-and-iscsi/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-are-the-benefits-to-fc-and-iscsi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Enhancetech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fibre channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI and FC Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI Ports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage in 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cost effective and easier to manage ?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cost effective and easier<br />
to manage ?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/what-are-the-benefits-to-fc-and-iscsi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stonefly optisan hanging</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/stonefly-optisan-hanging/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/stonefly-optisan-hanging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ITKE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optisan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stonefly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Area Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever I give a disk rescan, the server mysteriously gets  hung. the system log throws the following error &#8211; &#8220;A connection to the  target was lost, but Initiator successfully reconnected to the  target.  Dump data contains the target name.&#8221;  Storage : Stonefly optisan  Host : Windows 2003 ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I give a disk rescan, the server mysteriously gets  hung. the system log throws the following error &#8211; &#8220;A connection to the  target was lost, but Initiator successfully reconnected to the  target.  Dump data contains the target name.&#8221; </p>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Storage : Stonefly optisan <br />
Host : Windows 2003 <br/><br/>
</div>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/stonefly-optisan-hanging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyper-v + iscsi storage</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/hyper-v-plus-iscsi-storage-2/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/hyper-v-plus-iscsi-storage-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 13:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ITKE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we use a hyper-v server which has a connection with a storage server through ISCSI, we manage the hyper-v server with MS VMM. when creating a machine from a template it copy&#8217;s it to itself using BITS cause of that the creating taking 45min for deployment is there any way we can setup hyper-v or [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we use a hyper-v server which has a connection with a <b>storage</b> server through ISCSI,<br />
we manage the hyper-v server with  MS VMM.<br />
when creating a machine from a template it copy&#8217;s it to itself using BITS<br />
cause of that the creating taking 45min for deployment<br />
is there any way we can setup hyper-v or Iscsi that it knows that the destination path and template are on the same server and does not have to go over the network port ?</p>
<div>
server1: windows 2008 R2 = DC + microsoft VMM<br />
server2: windows 2008 R2= hyper-v server with iscsi iniator connection to server3(appears as local drive in drive management)<br />
server3: microsoft <b>storage</b> server 2008<br />
template is about 16gb ( windows 2008 machine for students)<br />
the current servers we have dont have dedicated iscsi ports yet<br />
so for testing purposes its on the same network</div>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/hyper-v-plus-iscsi-storage-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Total throughput on the iSCSI interface (between server and storage)</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/total-throughput-on-the-iscsi-interface-between-server-and-storage/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/total-throughput-on-the-iscsi-interface-between-server-and-storage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IHFL</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rack mounted servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization in 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If i put 4 No. 10/100/1000 ethernet ports on server as well as on storage and i connect and configure teaming of the ethernet ports; what troughput i should get from it. i) 4 GBPS throughput. ii) Less than 4 GBPS throughput and why less.?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i put 4 No. 10/100/1000 ethernet ports on server as well as on storage and i connect and configure teaming of the ethernet ports; what troughput i should get from it. <br/><br/> i) 4 GBPS throughput.<br/><br/> ii) Less than 4 GBPS throughput and why less.?<br/><br/></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/total-throughput-on-the-iscsi-interface-between-server-and-storage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/24 queries in 0.037 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 948/1033 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 17:38:24 -->