 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; SQL performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/development/sql-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:33:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>SQL Server Plan Cache</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql-server-plan-cache/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql-server-plan-cache/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Martinez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cache Mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL 2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a bucket in plan cache with 75 objects in it and it is the same sql statement. Other than using DBCC FREEPROCCACHE what will clear out the cache? Restarting SQL SERVER Service? I use the code below to look up how many plans are in a bucket. SELECT   bucketid,   entries_in_bucket = [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a bucket in plan cache with 75 objects in it and it is the same sql statement. Other than using DBCC FREEPROCCACHE what will clear out the cache? Restarting SQL SERVER Service? I use the code below to look up how many plans are in a bucket. <br/><br/> SELECT   bucketid,   entries_in_bucket = COUNT(*) FROM sys.dm_exec_cached_plans GROUP BY bucketid ORDER BY 2 DESC<br/><br/></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql-server-plan-cache/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition SP3 Performance</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql-server-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql-server-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Martinez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server 2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server 2005 SP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server Enterprise Edition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question Edited by Michael Tidmarsh]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Question Edited by Michael Tidmarsh]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql-server-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the SQL performance improvements in V6R1 affect QUERY?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/query-sql/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/query-sql/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[i5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL queries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Query]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V6R1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the SQL performance improvements in V6R1 affect QUERY? Does QUERY use SQL under the hood?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the SQL performance improvements in V6R1 affect QUERY?</p>
<div>Does QUERY use SQL under the hood?</div>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/query-sql/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SSRS &#8211; SQL runs in 1 minute but Reporting Services tuns for 30 minutes</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ssrs-sql-runs-in-1-minute-but-reporting-services-tuns-for-30-minutes/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ssrs-sql-runs-in-1-minute-but-reporting-services-tuns-for-30-minutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cvillavicencio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server Reporting Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a report whose dataset query that takes approximately 1 minute to run in SQL Management Server. That same query in a Reporting Services report takes aver 30 minutes to run. And it is inconsistent in its behavior since sometimes it will never finish running and error out. When it does run and it is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a report whose dataset query that takes approximately 1 minute to run in SQL Management Server. That same query in a Reporting Services report takes aver 30 minutes to run. And it is inconsistent in its behavior since sometimes it will never finish running and error out. When it does run and it is rendered. At the first user interaction it errors out regardless.<br/><br/> 1)  Has anyone run into an issue where the difference between SQL and Reporting Services is this huge?<br/><br/>  <br/><br/></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ssrs-sql-runs-in-1-minute-but-reporting-services-tuns-for-30-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Select into vs Insert into in SQL Server</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/select-into-vs-insert-into-in-sql-server/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/select-into-vs-insert-into-in-sql-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DBM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL INSERT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server 2000]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi experts, What is better between Select into vs Insert into in SQL Server when it comes to performance? thx]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi experts, What is better between Select into vs Insert into in SQL Server when it comes to performance?<br/><br/> thx<br/><br/></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/select-into-vs-insert-into-in-sql-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>slow update Query(Primary Key)</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/slow-update-queryprimary-key/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/slow-update-queryprimary-key/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mxaxyogesh2002</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Query]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dear Friends when i run below query its take more than 10 minutes and still running&#8230;. update auditdata set TATCallType=&#8217;12&#8242;,TATCallUnit=&#8217;1&#8242; from auditdata auditdata inner join Auditdata_sms_12 a_sns on auditdata.ID = a_sns.id auditdata is my original table in above table ID is primary key Auditdata_sms_12 is my temp table whats wrong in aobe SQL Query plz [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear Friends<br />
when i run below query its take<br />
more than 10 minutes and still running&#8230;.</p>
<p>update auditdata set TATCallType=&#8217;12&#8242;,TATCallUnit=&#8217;1&#8242; from auditdata auditdata inner join Auditdata_sms_12 a_sns on auditdata.ID = a_sns.id</p>
<p>auditdata is my original table<br />
in above table ID is primary key</p>
<p>Auditdata_sms_12 is my temp table</p>
<p>whats wrong in aobe SQL Query<br />
plz help me</p>
<p>thanx in advance..</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/slow-update-queryprimary-key/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQL2005 SP3</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql2005-sp3/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql2005-sp3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lmurthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL 2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL 2005 Service pack 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL 2005 SP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, I recently applied Service Pack 3 to SQL2005 64 bit and my server performance has been very slow since. The statistics have been updated on my databases, but that has not made a difference. Has anyone else experienced such behaviour post SP3 install? Thanks, Lakshmi]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
 I recently applied Service Pack 3 to SQL2005 64 bit and my server performance has been very slow since. The statistics have been updated on my databases, but that has not made a difference. </p>
<p>Has anyone else experienced such behaviour post SP3 install?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Lakshmi</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql2005-sp3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>understanding and detecting sql performance situation with abnormal 400 shutdown</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/understanding-and-detecting-sql-performance-situation-with-abnormal-400-shutdown/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/understanding-and-detecting-sql-performance-situation-with-abnormal-400-shutdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Modiyooch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DB2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPGLE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Need help in understanding and detecting situation with logical files built for sql rpgle performance and abnormal shutdown. Our system went down due to ups failure. All of a sudden the rpgle sql program is a resource hog because it is not selecting the lf that was built specifically for performance issues. LF is intact [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need help in understanding and detecting situation with logical files built for sql rpgle performance and abnormal shutdown.</p>
<p>Our system went down due to ups failure.  All of a sudden the rpgle sql program is a resource hog because it is not selecting the lf that was built specifically for performance issues.  LF is intact and shows not damage; it&#8217;s just not being used.  Program does not reference this file in the rpg sql statement, but has always used it.  I recompile the LF and everything is normal.<br />
My questions are 1. what&#8217;s going on?   and 2.  how do I query the system for other lfs that are now being ignored?  thanks</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/understanding-and-detecting-sql-performance-situation-with-abnormal-400-shutdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQL login client not admin</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql-login-client-not-admin/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql-login-client-not-admin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deliverance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it is payday and on the client side of our DB there are some login errors, where in SQL do you go to check points of failure?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is payday and on the client side of our DB there are some login errors, where in SQL do you go to check points of failure?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/sql-login-client-not-admin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PK allows null values in progress DB does this reduce performance of sql statements?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/pk-allows-null-values-in-progress-db-does-this-reduce-performance-of-sql-statements/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/pk-allows-null-values-in-progress-db-does-this-reduce-performance-of-sql-statements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NULL values in PK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL statements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Primary Key allows null values in progress DataBase, does this reduce performance of sql statements??]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
Primary Key allows null values in progress DataBase, does this reduce performance of sql statements??</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/pk-allows-null-values-in-progress-db-does-this-reduce-performance-of-sql-statements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/28 queries in 0.034 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 928/1074 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-23 19:55:57 -->