 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; Data center physical security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/data-center-physical-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>NFPA 75 update comparisons</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nfpa-75-update-comparisons/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nfpa-75-update-comparisons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leah Rosin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data center physical security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A SearchDataCenter.com reader wrote in with this question: What are the main differences between NFPA 75 1999 Edition and NFPA 75 2003 Edition that would impact the protection design and installation of fire suppression systems as well impact the facility operator?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A SearchDataCenter.com reader wrote in with this question: </p>
<p><i>What are the main differences between NFPA 75 1999 Edition and NFPA 75 2003 Edition that would impact the protection design and installation of fire suppression systems as well impact the facility operator?</i></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/nfpa-75-update-comparisons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HFC 125 vs FM 200 performance</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/hfc-125-vs-fm-200-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/hfc-125-vs-fm-200-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leah Rosin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data center design and infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data center physical security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A SearchDataCenter reader wrote in with this question: What is the difference in the performace of hfc227 compared with HFC 125 in the same application? What are the disadvantages of HFC 125 compared to HFC227(FM200)?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A SearchDataCenter reader wrote in with this question:<br />
<i> What is the difference in the performace of hfc227 compared with HFC 125 in the same application? What are the disadvantages of HFC 125 compared to HFC227(FM200)?</i></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/hfc-125-vs-fm-200-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/12 queries in 0.020 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 381/398 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-24 03:15:11 -->