 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Answers &#187; Cisco 4500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/tag/cisco-4500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Cisco oversubsciption and user-based rate limiting</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cisco-oversubsciption-and-user-based-rate-limiting/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cisco-oversubsciption-and-user-based-rate-limiting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nsqtr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco 4500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco switches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco User-Based Rate Limiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swicth Oversubscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a Cisco product,iIf I have an oversubscribed port or switch, does Weighted Fair Queueing kick in to handle UBRL issues? Assuming I have the correct Supervisor Engine/Netflow combination, how do I configure for this scenario?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a Cisco product,iIf I have an oversubscribed port or switch, does Weighted Fair Queueing kick in to handle UBRL issues?  Assuming I have the correct Supervisor Engine/Netflow combination, how do I configure for this scenario?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cisco-oversubsciption-and-user-based-rate-limiting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>cisco 4507 gigabit int down line protocol down</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cisco-4507-gigabit-int-down-line-protocol-down/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cisco-4507-gigabit-int-down-line-protocol-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ank1982</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco 4500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco 4507]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco switches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gigabit ethernet switches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi can any one help with this i am setting up 4507 with fiber connections but int never comes up it says gigabit int down line protocol down]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi can any one help with this i am setting up 4507 with fiber connections but int never comes up it says gigabit int down line protocol down</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cisco-4507-gigabit-int-down-line-protocol-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bladecenter ESX server Vlan problem</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/bladecenter-esx-server-vlan-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/bladecenter-esx-server-vlan-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bladecenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco 4500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco switches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VLAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware ESX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, The bladecenter was initially setup by a company and allows me to only create VM&#8217;s from Vlan 2. The issue is that I am out of Ip&#8217;s in that vlan and I wanted the ability to use another address space for the VM&#8217;s. I&#8217;ve already created a new vlan 20. Here is the current [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>The bladecenter was initially setup by a company and allows me to only create VM&#8217;s from Vlan 2.  The issue is that I am out of Ip&#8217;s in that vlan and I wanted the ability to use another address space for the VM&#8217;s.  I&#8217;ve already created a new vlan 20.</p>
<p>Here is the current config of the switch.  All I&#8217;ve added to these configurations from before was sw trunk allowed vlan add 20</p>
<p>Main Switch CISCO 4500</p>
<p>interface Port-channel1<br />
 switchport<br />
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q<br />
 switchport trunk native vlan 3<br />
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,20<br />
!</p>
<p>!<br />
interface GigabitEthernet5/39<br />
 description BLADECENTER-sw2-p17 Trunk Port<br />
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q<br />
 switchport trunk native vlan 3<br />
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,20<br />
 channel-group 1 mode on<br />
!<br />
interface GigabitEthernet6/2<br />
 description BLADECENTER-sw2-p17 Truck Port<br />
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q<br />
 switchport trunk native vlan 3<br />
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,20<br />
 channel-group 1 mode on<br />
!<br />
Switch config &#8211; Bladecenter sw1</p>
<p>vlan 2<br />
server</p>
<p>vlan 3<br />
WAN</p>
<p>vlan 20<br />
server2</p>
<p>interface Port-channel1<br />
 switchport trunk native vlan 3<br />
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,20</p>
<p>interface GigabitEthernet0/17<br />
 switchport trunk native vlan 3<br />
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,20<br />
 macro description cisco-switch<br />
 channel-group 1 mode on<br />
!<br />
interface GigabitEthernet0/18<br />
 switchport trunk native vlan 3<br />
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,20<br />
 macro description cisco-switch<br />
 channel-group 1 mode on</p>
<p>blade switchport where host is contained</p>
<p>interface GigabitEthernet0/9<br />
 description blade9<br />
 switchport trunk native vlan 2<br />
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 2,20<br />
 switchport mode trunk.</p>
<p>End result is I can&#8217;t use any vlans from that new range.  I&#8217;ve been reading and thinking there are configuration changes I need to make on the ESX server itself with vlan tagging and such.   Nothing like that is setup currently.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/bladecenter-esx-server-vlan-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.022 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 464/514 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 08:22:10 -->