SQL Server 32 bit, AWE/3GB/PAE
55 pts.
0
Q:
SQL Server 32 bit, AWE/3GB/PAE
I have read quite a few articles that recommend turning on /3GB on a server with 32bit SQL server and 32bit Windows 2003 standard where you have between 4GB and 16GB or RAM. Why is /3GB needed? Just so SQL Server can have more VAS, and because VAS is better than AWE mapped memory? This switch effectively limits your kernel to 1GB right? Why put the limit on if you have 6 extra GB for SQL Server?

Software/Hardware used:
Windows 2003 Standard 32bit, SQL 2005 Standard 32bit
ASKED: Sep 23 2009  8:49 PM GMT
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
0
46735 pts.
0
A:
 RATE THIS ANSWER
+1
Click to Vote:
  •   1
  •  0
  • AddThis Social Bookmark Button
The /3GB switch increases the virtual address space from 2 Gigs to 3 Gigs. This increases the potential size of the procedure cache and application memory.
Last Answered: Sep 24 2009  0:36 AM GMT by Mrdenny   46735 pts.
0
0
Discuss This Answer:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _



_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Jagoodie   55 pts.  |   Sep 24 2009  12:47AM GMT

Thank you! I think you are right, but do you have any documentation about this?

 

mrdenny   46735 pts.  |   Sep 24 2009  7:43PM GMT

Here you go. 6th paragraph.

 

Jagoodie   55 pts.  |   Sep 24 2009  8:49PM GMT

Thanks again. Exactly what I was looking for. I just read here: <a href="http://www.modhul.com/2007/11/10/optimising-system-memory-for-sql-server-part-i/" title="http://www.modhul.com/2007/11/10/optimising-system-memory-for-sql-server-part-i/" target="_blank">http://www.modhul.com/2007/11/10/optimis…</a>
that Windows 2003 Standard will only see 4gb. Does that mean it is not worthwhile to add an additional 4gb to the system to allow SQL server with AWE to utilize all 8?

 

mrdenny   46735 pts.  |   Sep 26 2009  1:15AM GMT

This is true, Windows 2003 x86 will max out at 4 Gigs. This is a licensing limitation, not a physical limitation. You’d need to upgrade to Windows Enterprise x86 to use more RAM.

 
0