 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEU user defined Exit program problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/seu-user-defined-exit-program-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/seu-user-defined-exit-program-problem/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tomliotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/seu-user-defined-exit-program-problem/#comment-83380</link>
		<dc:creator>tomliotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-83380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not at all sure how RCLRSC would help. I can&#039;t quite see that it should be run.

I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if a compiler used the same method to bring program source into memory for compilation as SEU does for editting. They could easily clobber each others&#039; memory work spaces.

First thing I would try is to break the call to the compiler out into a separate program. My SEU exit program would call the new program to do compiles. The new program would run in a different activation group, either a named AG or *NEW.

It might not solve the problem, but it might produce enough of a different error to help see the problem.

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not at all sure how RCLRSC would help. I can&#8217;t quite see that it should be run.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if a compiler used the same method to bring program source into memory for compilation as SEU does for editting. They could easily clobber each others&#8217; memory work spaces.</p>
<p>First thing I would try is to break the call to the compiler out into a separate program. My SEU exit program would call the new program to do compiles. The new program would run in a different activation group, either a named AG or *NEW.</p>
<p>It might not solve the problem, but it might produce enough of a different error to help see the problem.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.033 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 267/273 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-22 02:20:48 -->